Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.astronomy    |    Staring up at the stars...    |    132 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 130 of 132    |
|    Kualinar to All    |
|    Re: The fantasy of starships is no more     |
|    24 Feb 26 10:27:39    |
      From: kuakinar@videotron.ca              Le 2026-02-24 à 09:53, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn a écrit :       > Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:       >> We have ISS.       >       > Yes.       >       >> Can we expand ISS into a huge space-ship or star-ship?       >       > No.       >       >> Only time will tell.       >       > The ISS is going to be deorbited, i.e. destroyed, soon :'-(       >       >> I believe human being will try to build it but not on the ground,       >       > Yes, that would make little sense. Like a too large radio telescope, the       > ship will be crushed under its own weight while still in construction.       >       >> possibly at Lagrange points.       >       > Unlikely. Being at a Lagrange point does not mean that you do not need       > thrusters to stay there (at least L1 and L2). Also, the Lagrange points of       > a system can be very far away from each body (L1 and L2 of Sol--Terra, where       > solar observatories and e.g. the JWST are orbiting, respectively, are 1.5       > million km away from Terra). Standard orbits are much less expensive in       > terms of fuel, both maintaining them and getting there and back.       >       >> Building a huge space-ship that can both land and fly to space indeed       >> sounds impossible, right now.       >       > I doubt that this is a feasible design to begin with. Even in Star Trek the       > only *starship* class that could land on a terrestrial planet was the most       > modern class, the Intrepid class represented on screen by the U.S.S.       > Voyager; for landing on planets they usually use(d) relatively small       > shuttlecraft that were carried along by a starship, and the transporter beam       > (crash landings aside, of course).       >       >> SpaceX Starship is just the beginning??? :)       >       > Correct.       >       > F'up2 alt.astronomy       >              The L4 and L5 Lagrange points are pretty stable, but they are located at       1AU from us, at 60° in front and behind the Earth, forming equilateral       triangle with the Earth and the Sun.       That means that any communication will incur an 8 minutes delay, one       way, 16 minutes both way.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca