XPost: alt.astrology   
   From: Stargazer-Silveen@t-online.de   
      
   "Bob Officer"  schrieb im Newsbeitrag   
   news:lcg9f5t521t8u5g8ndj2endlvvdu9vu9nt@4ax.com...   
   > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:12:14 -0000, in alt.astrology, "A B"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>"Edmond H. Wollmann"  wrote on 3rd November:   
   >>> Archetypes (astrological signs) are references to concepts and   
   >>> consciousness, like genes they describe potentials, not dicta.   
   >>   
   >>Of course.  But as far as any chart goes, that is a pretty striking one.   
   >>A. B.   
   >   
   > Astrological Archetypes are arbitrary and made up nonsense.   
   >   
   >   
   > --   
   > Ak'toh'di   
      
   Hello Bob Officer:   
      
   your statements  remind me of (this really happened only a few days ago)   
   the "lady" who told the doctors (including the professor) at a hospital here   
   what they needed to do to "properly" treat the old lady who was the   
   patient and who had to be there _because_ she had not been taken care   
   of  (as doctor-instructed) by that woman.   
   She knew as much about medicine as you seem to know about   
   astrology. She also made a raving fool of herself and was eventually   
   actually kicked out of the place and is told not to come back.   
      
   Question again is: WHY are you frequenting this group here, if you   
   do not want to _learn_ ? There is really so much to learn, it could be   
   a wonderful, absolutely time filling hobby (as you _seem_ to be bored   
   with the rest of your life). You would also find out that most astrologers   
   are true idealists who spent much time (many years) learning their trade   
   and hesitate charging for their time and knowledge.   
   Like in ALL professions we can find the so called "black sheep";   
   just look at the worst recent stories of brokers, bankers, polititans, etc.,   
   etc.   
   so there is no need to say that ALL of one kind of profession, of   
   race, of culture . . . . are all "black sheep". - - o. k. ?!?!   
      
   But you yourself can learn by reading, really studying the subject in   
   question.   
   Also, we learn easier, if we take the given instructions and, if we do   
   not agree, or do not understand the given information, we come up   
   with the appropriate questions.   
   The nice thing now a days is that we can find just about every book,   
   every lecture, every help through  the internet - when I started, there   
   was no such convenience available and - I lived in Virginia then -   
   there were no books on the subject of astrology, but many forms of   
   bibles and related information. This was one of the reasons I just   
   had to go West, ended up in California, where I was able to get all   
   necessary information to do my studies.   
   Ask and people of knowledge will give you answers. If you are   
   interested, but do not really want to admit to it, go to a more   
   professional group, a moderated one, this would keep all the OT posts   
   out and you can concentrate on the subject of your interest - astrology ? -   
      
   So much for now.   
   You take care and have a nice weekend.   
   Be well,   
   IRH/Silveen   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)