XPost: alt.astrology   
   From: wollmannspredictions@areall.invalid   
      
   Edmond H. Wollmann, fraud, liar, and loser, wrote:   
   > Bob Officer wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:07:53 -0800 (PST), in alt.astrology, The True   
   >> Edmond Wollmann  wrote:   
   >   
   >>> On Jan 12, 11:24 am, "A B"  wrote:   
   >>>> "A B"  wrote on 6th January:   
   >>>>    
   >>>>   
   >>>>> * How should aspects be measured?  Agnes Fyfe claimed that the chemical   
   >>>>> effect only appeared when the planets were conjunct visibly, that is, in   
   >>>>> declination as well as Zodiac degree.  If so, the same might apply in   
   >>>>> other branches of astrology.   
   >>>> Sorry, it wasn't Agnes Fyfe, it was Dirk Rohde.  I forgot to mention him.   
   >>>> He wrote a very complete account of his experiments, available   
   at:http://www.science.anth.org.uk/kolisko/rohde.htm   
   >>>> The results he reported were less dramatic than some of the others, but   
   >>>> still quite definite.  Of course, without further research by better-known   
   >>>> scientists we have to take his word for it.   
   >>>> A. B.   
   >   
   >>> Astrology is learned and proved through application,   
   >   
   >> However that isn't proof.   
   >   
   > NOTHING is ever proven.   
      
   Bullshit.   
      
   In the deposition you had to take it was proven that you had been   
   convicted of some crimes. You had to admit it.   
      
   So there, criminal. It's been proven you're a convicted criminal.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)