384f5878   
   XPost: alt.astrology, alt.paranet.metaphysics   
   From: patrick@io.com   
      
   On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:49:10 -0800 (PST), Edmond H. Wollmann wrote:   
   > "The universe is bigger than we think. This seems to be a cosmic   
   > truth. Times change, theories evolve, astronomers see new things in   
   > their telescopes?and the universe always turns out to be vaster and   
   > more mind-boggling than anyone suspected. The most dazzling new theory   
   > holds that our universe isn't just big, it's one of many. It's like a   
   > bubble in a huge vat of beer, and every other bubble is another   
   > universe. (We like this image for some reason.) Our concept of the   
   > universe used to be tidier. Ancient Egyptians thought the sky was held   
   > up by mountains at the comers of the Earth, and the stars were not so   
   > far away. But in the 17th century the telescope shattered that notion.   
   > Through the lens, the stars were countless, and space had depth.   
   > Stars were suns, rendered faint only by great distance. Then, in 1923,   
   > Edwin Hubble proved that mysterious, wispy things called nebulae are   
   > actually galaxies, or "island universes," outside our own.   
   > New telescopes have since revealed ever more galaxies, and we've grown   
   > accustomed to living in Carl Sagan's cosmos, with billions and   
   > trillions of galaxies, each utterly lousy with stars. But Sagan may   
   > have been underestimating.   
   > A satellite called the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe recently   
   > captured a glimpse of the residual radiation from the young universe,   
   > when there were no galaxies, only perturbations in a seething,   
   > expanding cosmos. The data give a precise age to the universe: 13.7   
   > billion years, plus or minus 200 million years. Perhaps more   
   > significantly, the data support the idea of cosmic inflation, a   
   > variant of the big bang. The inflationary theory states that very   
   > early in the expansion the cosmos suddenly inflated, becoming   
   > unimaginably vast in a fraction of a second.   
   > If inflation is correct, the universe really is more than a million   
   > trillion trillion trillion times larger than the already enormous   
   > visible cosmos. It's practically infinite in scale. You have to speak   
   > like a child to convey the idea?it's basically a gazillion times   
   > larger than we thought. And there's more: One variation of the   
   > inflation theory suggests that our universe is a calm bubble, a kind   
   > of "no inflation zone" within an infinitely large, chaotic, eternally   
   > inflating "multiverse," and that this multiverse contains countless   
   > bubble universes, some of which almost surely contain intelligent   
   > observers trying to make sense of their own crazy cosmos.   
   > The problem is, a multiverse is a hard theory to prove. "Is this   
   > science? Not yet" warns cosmologist Michael Turner of the University   
   > of Chicago. "We can't test it" But here's the most alarming part about   
   > living in a multiverse. If the cosmos is more or less infinite in   
   > scale, then statistical probabilities dictate that somewhere there's a   
   > planet identical to Earth, containing creatures identical to us,   
   > leading identical lives.   
   > We don't buy it. Could there really be another world where Adam   
   > Sandler is a movie star???Joel Achenbach Washington Post Staff writer,   
   > National Geographic, August 2003   
      
   You eminently deserve a permanent position in the annual San Antonio   
   Festival...of course, as El Rey Feo.   
      
   --   
    Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas   
    www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273   
    LAST GAME: Rockford 3, Houston 2 (SO, March 14)   
    NEXT GAME: Saturday, March 20 vs. Milwaukee, 7:35   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|