XPost: aus.tv, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.astrology   
   From: desertphile@invalid-address.net   
      
   On Tue,  8 Jun 2010 19:08:00 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio   
    wrote:   
      
   > In article <0ff70afa-310e-47e8-b82e-210b3e28f9b7@a39g2000prb.g   
   oglegroups.com>   
   > "Edmond H. Wollmann"  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > On Jun 8, 8:28=A0am, Desertphile    
   > > wrote:   
   > > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 06:44:46 -0700 (PDT), "Edmond H. Wollmann"   
   > > >   
   > > >  wrote:   
   > > > > On Jun 8, 6:09 am, Werewolfy  wrote:   
   > > > > > On 8 June, 08:57, Graham Cooper  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > > WHY SKEPTICS CHEAT   
   > > >   
   > > > > > Because they can't fucking spell the word, 'sceptic', and because   
   the=   
   > > y   
   > > > > > post to forums where they are not wanted.   
   > > > > Randi and the others are performers and KOOKs, not skeptics.   
   > > >   
   > > > Actually, that describes you, freak. You're a fraud; astrology is   
   > > > a scam; you're an abusive schizophrenic shit stain.   
   > >   
   > > I see, is that a scientific determination?   
      
   > Yes, and it's all documented at http://www.smbtech.com/ed.   
      
   Hell, that's NOTHING compared to what the Loony Tune has written   
   in Usenet. Some of Wollmann's lies were exposed in alt.astrology   
   over a decade ago, and he still hops up and down over it.   
      
      
   --   
   http://desertphile.org   
   Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water   
   "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)