9b4827e5   
   XPost: alt.astrology.marketplace, alt.astrology   
   From: patrick@io.com   
      
   On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:47:10 -0700 (PDT), Edmond H. Wollmann  wrote:   
   > alt.astrology.metapsych   
   > Created by Edmond Wollmann;   
   >   
   > November 24, 1996, 2:05 am, La Jolla, California, USA   
   >   
   >   
   > This unmoderated newsgroup is being proposed and being created for   
   > discussion of the psychological/metaphysical/spiritual aspects of   
   > astrology and its applications.   
   >   
   >   
   > For your newsgroups file:   
   > alt.astrology.metapsych Discussion of astrology   
   > metaphysically/psychologically/spiritually.   
   >   
   >   
   >=========Charter for alt.astrology.metapsych=========   
   > Charter: This group is for astrologers and students of astrology or   
   > practicing therapists and psychologists to discuss aspects of   
   > astrology   
   > primarily-but not limited to psychological/metaphysical/spiritual   
   > approaches of counsel and practice. This includes;   
   >   
   >   
   > 1) Personal analysis of horoscopes based on full data and   
   > information.   
   > 2) Psychological approaches and remediation methods in counsel.   
   > 3) Psychological fields of approach.   
   > 4) Metaphysical and/or spiritual approaches and their connections.   
   > 5) Humanistic, holistic or other modern or otherwise defined as new   
   > age   
   > approaches.   
   >   
   >   
   > Since this group is proposed on the basis of ethical and respectable   
   > service oriented counsel and astrological application, the following   
   > classes of posts are not welcome;   
   >   
   >   
   > 1) Advertisements of any sort (other than normal sig file references   
   > related to this group).   
   > 2) Arguments as to the validity of astrology AT ALL, either   
   > scientifically or theologically.   
      
   You're the Supreme Idiot, and Usenet couldn't care less about your   
   vanity-created newsgroup so your "fans" could worship you (and allow you to   
   defraud them).   
      
   > 3) Cynical or otherwise detracting and negative and conflictive   
   > argumentation that deviates from the subject matter.   
      
   You're by far the one that does just that.   
      
   > 4) JPEG's, GIF's or other images not specifically related to topic   
   > discussion.   
      
   If by nothing but random chance, you actually got one right, whether you   
   realized it or not.   
      
   > 5) Defamation or derogatory/abusive attacks on individuals simply   
   > because of disagreement.   
      
   It's just an amazing coincidence that you're an illegal astronomer in a city   
   that requires said license.   
      
   [...]   
      
   > This group is for business purposes only. Therefore, the following   
   > classes of posts are not welcome:   
   >   
   > 1) Discussions of any sort.   
   > 2) Arguments about the legitimacy of astrology.   
   > 3) JPEGS, GIFS and other images.   
   > 4) Advertisements from non-astrologers.   
      
   Business newsgroups aren't in alt., idiot.  It's no mystery that you'd try   
   to ban discussions of any sort...i.e., you demand that no one says anything   
   to offend what's left of your psyche.  Too bad Usenet and that bothersome   
   First Amendment nukes your impossible dream.  If you'd get the license,   
   you'd still be the wreck you are, but you'd be legal.  That's enough to make   
   me thankful that I don't live in a state that requires licenses for   
   funnypeople such as yourself.   
      
   --   
       Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, TX   
           www.prismnet.com/~patrick (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273   
                   LAST GAME: San Antonio 3, Houston 2 (April 11)   
               NEXT GAME:  Saturday, October 9 at Oklahoma City, 7:05   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)