[continued from previous message]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, not you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because what's now being asked of the SEC is to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigate who bought a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ton of futures <30 minutes before the Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement, as it stinks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of high heaven of illegal insider trading.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about a simple agreement: anyone who made
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than $10M in futures
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bought on the afternoon of April 9th should get the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> death penalty?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why? Smart people bother you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its not from being smart, but from illegally using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insider trading.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leftist morons don't even know what insider trading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so then you're confessing to being a "Leftist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moron". Good to know!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a clue...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Insider trading is when somebody buys because they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know the price is going to go up. It's not what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes the price go up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incorrect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Insider trading is the term for the illegal practice of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buying or selling a company's securities based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nonpublic information. That nonpublic information is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known to an "insider" and is material and not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available at that time to the general public. Insider
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information gives the insider an unfair advantage over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other investors, and it is generally illegal for them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to act upon it, both directly & indirectly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An example of the former is a buy/sell of XYZ stock and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an example latter is to call & tell your mom to go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buy/sell XYZ stock.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martha Stewart went to jail for this crime.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I said, and you cannot refute, insider trading not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what makes the price go up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've ignored how I never disputed that part.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To call that a result of insider trading is incredibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, what's incredibly stupid is your misrepresentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because insider trading isn't actions which change the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> price of an Equity, but is the act of transacting based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on possessing privileged information on what an Equity's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future valuation is **going to become** once that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> privileged information is made public to the Market.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thus, which direction a future valuation is going to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it is the act of misuse of privileged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 'textbook' classical examples are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * to sell before bad news becomes public;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * to buy before good news becomes public.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you agree that the morons claiming that the big
>>>>>>>>>>>>> increases in the market prices could not be because of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> insider trading..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4/9's big increases in prices were from deliberate market
>>>>>>>>>>>> manipulation perpetrated by Trump, & whoever was guiding
>>>>>>>>>>>> him on what to say & when.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Insiders trading on prior knowledge of Trump's "90 day"
>>>>>>>>>>>> profited. Trump named a few of them that same day (press
>>>>>>>>>>>> sec: "oops!")
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Foil hat time for you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nope, just staying current on news.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Case in point, here's a report on the signal of insider
>>>>>>>>>> trading that Alan & I have been referring to:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And FYI, on the "oh, but both R's & D's do it" deflection
>>>>>>>>>> attempt, there's reports on that unethical behavior too:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So? What are you going to do about it? Nothing? Then STFU.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On the contrary: I've already taken actions. Just because
>>>>>>>> I've not detailed them all to you doesn't mean that they don't
>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what are _you_ going to do about it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What have you done beside stomp your feet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally hedged my risk tolerance.
>>>>>> Provided financial advice to others.
>>>>>> Bailed out a financially strapped MAGA family member.
>>>>>> Reminded you & other cultists that you've fucked yourselves.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So other than to continue to stomp your little feet, what are
>>>>>> _you_ going to do about it, hmmmm?
>>>>> Skeeter-Shit will just continue to piss away his time posting
>>>>> meaningless bullshit to Usenet, just as he has done for the past
>>>>> 10 years.
>>>>
>>>> I been [sic] on usenet over 20 years you noob.
>>>
>>> "I been" ? you also say "I seen," don't you?
>>>
>>> So, pissing away your useless time on Usenet for 20 years. That's
>>> not a good thing to admit.
>>
>> Eating shit is my job.
>
> Of course it is.
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "so what"
>>>>> "who cares"
>>>>> "bring it bitch"
>>>>> "TINW"
>>>>>
>>>>> and other meaningless dribble from his asshole.
>>>>
>>>> HH doesn't like you either.
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>
>> He said so.
> No, he didn't.
Irregardless, you'd lie about it.
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
