XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   Dawn Flood wrote:   
   > On 12/31/2025 11:38 AM, JTEM wrote:   
   >> On 12/30/25 6:23 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> It's closer to the sun and it's atmosphere is a lot thicker.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Btw; where are you pretending the CO2 on Venus came from?   
   >>   
   >>> Does not make sense, as Venus' day is longer than its year.   
   >>   
   >> So?  Water vapor is at least 50x more effective as a "Greenhouse   
   >> Gas" -- practically EVERYTHING is a better "Greenhouse Gas" than   
   >> CO2 -- yet Venus likes to strip it's water from the atmosphere   
   >> while the earth, nice & wet, is not even close to as warm.   
   >>   
   >> See (no you don't), you've been fed a narrative which you've   
   >> mistaken for an education.   
   >>   
   >> CO2 was never an issue.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Just Google this -- composition of Venus' atmosphere percentages:   
   >   
   > Major Components:   
   >     Carbon Dioxide (CO2): ~96.5%   
   >     Nitrogen (N2): ~3.5%   
   >   
   > Trace Gases (Examples):   
   >     Sulfur Dioxide (\(SO_{2}\))   
   >     Carbon Monoxide (CO)   
   >     Water Vapor (\(H_{2}O\))   
   >     Helium (He) Argon (Ar) Neon (Ne)   
   >   
   > Now, how does 367 W/m² get a planet's surface (even with 1400   
   > hours of continuous nighttime) to 465C??   
   >   
   > I am ready to abandon the AGW hoax here today if you can explain   
   > this for me!   
   >   
   > Dawn   
      
   that's not a good idea, anything can be explained for anything   
   using personal logic and personal truth.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)