XPost: sci.skeptic, soc.history.ancient   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/11/2026 8:53 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   > JTEM  wrote in news:10k185n$8cq6$1@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> On 1/11/26 11:30 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>> On 1/8/2026 11:19 AM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>> On 1/8/26 1:05 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>> On 1/7/2026 12:57 AM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://greekreporter.com/2026/01/07/pottery-mount-ararat-noah-ark-   
   >>>>>> debate/   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Eew! Eew! Science is wrong! Noah's Ark isn't real!"   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Yep, it's a myth that got a remake from Sumerian lore.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I was under the impression that you schitzophrenics "Hear"   
   >>>> things, not look at URLs and imagine seeing any mention   
   >>>> of "Sumerian lore."   
   >>   
   >>> That's where the Flood story in the Bible came from!   
   >>   
   >> So you don't know the difference between science and the bible,   
   >> and that's why when you see a thread on scientific proof you   
   >> immediately confuse it for the bible.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > There is no scientific proof of the Flood story.   
   > It is mythology, no different from Pandora's box   
   > and Paul Bunyon.   
   >   
   > If you had any proof you would post it, but there   
   > isn't so you don't.   
   >   
      
   Yeppers!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)