Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atheism    |    All of them praying there isn't a God    |    338,838 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 338,085 of 338,838    |
|    Dawn Flood to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    26 Jan 26 00:50:05    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.messianic       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/26/2026 12:42 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 25/01/2026 à 17:41, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >>> Where is the experiment in astronomy (Feynman was a physicist) ?       >>> Current CMIP models outputs don't match observations. those CMIP       >>> models hypothesis are invalid (falsified by observations). Lets wait       >>> another 30 years or more to see how nowaday models match future       >>> climate observations.       >>>       >>       >> You can't be serious, can you? Do you know of the prediction made by       >> Edmond Halley??       >       > Astronomy is a very serious science, but where experimentation is       > impossible. Feynman was a physicist, so he said "experiment", but what       > he meant is that you compare the output of models (based on your       > hypothesis) with new (future) observations.              I saw the total eclipse of 2024 from the center-line in Missouri with my       family; that eclipse was predicted to occur in the 19th-century. I have       no idea whatsoever of where you are getting the idea that       "experimentation is impossible" in the science of astronomy. Any       testable prediction, even in astronomy, is an "experiment", which is how       they refer to their observation runs.              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca