Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atheism    |    All of them praying there isn't a God    |    338,838 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 338,094 of 338,838    |
|    Paul Aubrin to All    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    26 Jan 26 08:13:16    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic       From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org              Le 25/01/2026 à 15:36, Vincent Maycock a écrit :       > Arctic ice is decreasing, regardless of whether some people quoted on       > Facebook speculated about the extent of that process. Also,       > meteorology is not an exact science like physics, and you don't       > consider your weekly local weather forecast to be "falsified" if it       > predicts rain and you just get a cloudy day sometimes.              Nostradamus predictions are said to sometimes match reality. Would you       say that Nostradamus forecasting method is valid ?       Weather forecast match quite well reality for the next 10 or 12 days.       Beyond that they are useless. The validity domain of weather forecasts       is observed to be a few days. The validity domain of CMIP models has       been observed to be nil.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca