Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atheism    |    All of them praying there isn't a God    |    338,838 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 338,101 of 338,838    |
|    Dawn Flood to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    26 Jan 26 08:12:01    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.messianic       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/26/2026 1:07 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 25/01/2026 à 19:20, Mitchell Holman a écrit :       >> Modern Conservative: Someone who denies evolution       >> and AGW and vaccines because "they don't trust       >> science" but who then demands the latest advances       >> in science be used on them when they get sick.       >>       >       > Nobody "trusts Science". There are sciences which establish the validity       > domain of some hypothesis by comparing their preditions with observations.       > If observations don't match the modelized output, the model is useless.       > No CMIP model could match observation in four atmospheric domains over a       > 40 years period. All CMIP models have been invalidated (forever).       >              And, so, Newtonian mechanics, along with its reformulation into       Lagrangian mechanics which was reformulated into Hamiltonian mechanics,       is useless?! Is THAT what you are saying??? As such, every physicist       has to work in the domain of General Relativity, and nothing else, correct?              Ask yourself this, "How long did the Great Oxidation Event last?"       (Answer: 250 Myr.) Forty years in geological time is NOTHING! No one       (and, I mean, NO ONE, at least in Science) thinks this way!!              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca