Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atheism    |    All of them praying there isn't a God    |    338,838 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 338,111 of 338,838    |
|    Paul Aubrin to All    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    26 Jan 26 19:42:55    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.messianic       From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org              Le 26/01/2026 à 15:04, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >> Scientific findings can be trusted provided that you know their       >> validity domain derived from observations and associated uncertainty.       >>       >       > Yeah, you're pounding on an open door; everyone in Science knows this.       > You act like the IPCC has made no predictions whatsoever.              CMIP models made a lot of predictions. They have been compared with       observations. No CMIP model could match reality in all four domains of       the atmosphere.       NB : If your prediction fails, your set of hypothesis is erroneous.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca