XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.messianic   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/26/2026 12:42 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   > Le 26/01/2026 à 15:04, Dawn Flood a écrit :   
   >>> Scientific findings can be trusted provided that you know their   
   >>> validity domain derived from observations and associated uncertainty.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, you're pounding on an open door; everyone in Science knows this.   
   >> You act like the IPCC has made no predictions whatsoever.   
   >   
   > CMIP models made a lot of predictions. They have been compared with   
   > observations. No CMIP model could match reality in all four domains of   
   > the atmosphere.   
   > NB : If your prediction fails, your set of hypothesis is erroneous.   
   >   
      
   One could make the exact same claims about Newton's Laws; they all,   
   without exception, fail; find me a physicist who thinks they are invalid!   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)