Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
| alt.atheism | All of them praying there isn't a God | 338,838 messages |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
| Message 338,135 of 338,838 |
| Paul Aubrin to All |
| Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis |
| 27 Jan 26 07:16:02 |
XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.messianic From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org Le 27/01/2026 à 01:23, Dawn Flood a écrit : >> To day I danced a rain dance. If it rains tomorrow, how would you >> explain that ? >> > > Only if your predictions can constitute a statistically significant result That is not enough. One single erroneous prediction can invalidate a false hypothesis. But you need many good predictions, all over the validity domain, to gain confidence in a new hypothesis. All the climate models failed the comparison with observations over the 1979 to 2016 periodd. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca