Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atheism    |    All of them praying there isn't a God    |    338,838 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 338,141 of 338,838    |
|    Dawn Flood to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    27 Jan 26 07:30:59    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.messianic       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/27/2026 12:16 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 27/01/2026 à 01:23, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >>> To day I danced a rain dance. If it rains tomorrow, how would you       >>> explain that ?       >>>       >>       >> Only if your predictions can constitute a statistically significant       >> result       >       > That is not enough. One single erroneous prediction can invalidate a       > false hypothesis. But you need many good predictions, all over the       > validity domain, to gain confidence in a new hypothesis.       > All the climate models failed the comparison with observations over the       > 1979 to 2016 periodd.       >              They also fail over the 2016-2017 period, as well as this past weekend.       Try extending your graph instead of cropping it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca