Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atheism    |    All of them praying there isn't a God    |    338,838 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 338,145 of 338,838    |
|    Paul Aubrin to All    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    27 Jan 26 18:32:13    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic       From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org              Le 27/01/2026 à 15:54, Vincent Maycock a écrit :       >> You only need a large number of "models". It will be very likely that       >> one of them will make a good prediction..       >> The IPCC made 108 runs of 34 models. That is enough to always find one       >> that made some good "prediction" at some moment.       > No, they can't do that if they're all in essential agreement with each       > other.              Being in agreement with each other (this is not the case) doesn't       matter. A model should be in agreement with OBSERVATIONS. It has been       prouved that it is not the case. All current CMIP models have been       invalidated (forever).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca