XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.messianic   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/27/2026 12:11 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   > Le 27/01/2026 à 14:29, Dawn Flood a écrit :   
   >> As I said, look at Dr. Roy Spencer's website and test the coefficient   
   >> of the time series regression for yourself; even his datasets (which   
   >> he updates monthly) shows an upward trend.  Now, extend that line for   
   >> 1,000 years and get back to us.   
   >   
   > The observed trends are much lower than hinted by the IPCC and its CMIP   
   > models.   
   >   
   > https://i.postimg.cc/9FPwCSDD/climate-Trends.png   
   >   
   > Furthermore, the 1915-1945 trend was greater than the 1975-2020 trend   
   > when CO2 concentrations were very low ! How can it be if CO2   
   > concentrations play a PREPONDERANT role ?   
   >   
   > #Selected data from 1915   
   > #Selected data up to 1945   
   > #Least squares trend line; slope = 0.0161135 per year   
   > #Selected data from 1945   
   > #Selected data up to 1975   
   > #Least squares trend line; slope = 0.00323791 per year   
   > #Selected data from 1975   
   > #Selected data up to 2020   
   > #Least squares trend line; slope = 0.0154914 per year   
      
   The NASA GISS datasets are here:   
      
   https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/   
      
   The CO2 data is here:   
      
   https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/data.html   
      
   Run the regression yourself; when I do this, I get an R-square of 0.93;   
   explain that!   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)