XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/27/2026 8:01 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 1/27/26 4:52 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> And, so   
   >   
   > So what?  You burnt it all down. You have zero credibility. I respond   
   > to your idiocy for both my own sake -- the entertainment value -- and   
   > as an excuse to post something true & useful.   
   >   
   > According to WokeTards, GWOBULL WARBLING started in the 1800s. They   
   > can't agree on when exactly -- some say the mid to late 1800s, others   
   > say the early 1800s -- but the AGW narrative pretends that GWOBULL   
   > WARBLING began in the 1800s. And it began when CO2 emissions hit about   
   > 1 billion tons per years.   
   >   
   > You guys know that China -- not the planet but China, China all by   
   > itself -- OFFICIALLY topped 12 billion tons per year a few years ago.   
   >   
   > I mean, you do know that... right?   
   >   
   > And, you know that humans exhale CO2. Right?   
   >   
   > You learned that in grade school, didn't you? You learned that humans   
   > breath in oxygen and breath out CO2. Right? You did. As a small   
   > child, you learned this.   
   >   
   > Well. Just from the growth of the human population alone, and the human   
   > population grew by about 7 billion if you didn't know... just from all   
   > the additional people exhaling now, just from the increase in the number   
   > of people breathing between the imaginary start of "AGW" and today...   
   >   
   > Humans produce MORE THAN TWICE AS MUCH CO2 as what the narrative claims   
   > got AGW started in the first place, back in the 1800s.   
   >   
   > So, even if 100% of all human industry vanished tomorrow, even if we   
   > returned to stone aged tech, nothing more complex then sharpening the   
   > end of a stick with a rock, we couldn't end GWOBULL WARBLING, is this   
   > "Science" you believe in is right.   
   >   
   > Worse?  CO2 levels would still GROW for many years because that same   
   > narrative claims that CO2 stays in the atmosphere for 300 to a thousand   
   > years!   
   >   
   > UNLESS WE KILL MANY BILLIONS OF PEOPLE, even if we eliminate 100% of our   
   > technology, absolutely NOTHING invented by so called "Modern" humans   
   > survives, then it is literally impossible, according to your precious   
   > AGW narrative, to lower CO2 level so much as one iota, not until some   
   > DECADES after 1830... at the very least. And we could only reduce CO2   
   > by then if we return to pre Neanderthal levels of technology.   
   >   
   > Or if we kill about 7.5 out of 8 billion people...   
   >   
      
   Let's assume that you are correct, and the science of climate change is   
   a complete fraud.  What harm has such caused??   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)