XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic   
   From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org   
      
   Le 10/02/2026 à 19:03, Dawn Flood a écrit :   
   >> CMIP climate models have been falsified when it has been observed that   
   >> their output (all of them) doesn't match the observe (satellites,   
   >> weather balloons) temperature evolution in 4 domains over a period of   
   >> four decades.   
   >> According to the scientific method (compare hypothesis with reality)   
   >> those models are invalidated.   
   >>   
   >   
   > No, they have not been invalidated.   
      
   The predictions made with those models happened to not match observation   
   over a 40 years period. Thus, they have been (all) invalidated.   
      
   “Now I'm going to discuss how we would look for a new law.   
   In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First we   
   guess it. Well don't laugh that's really true. Then we compute the   
   consequences of the guess to see, if this law that we guessed is right,   
   what it would imply, and then we compare those computational results to   
   nature (to experiment or experience). That is we compare it directly   
   with observation to see if it works. If it disagrees with experiment,   
   it's wrong.   
   In that simple statement is the key to science.   
   It doesn't make any difference how beautiful your guess is. It doesn't   
   make any difference how smart you are who made the guess, or what your   
   name is. If it disagrees with experiment it's wrong, that's all.”   
   Richard Feynman   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)