Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atheism    |    All of them praying there isn't a God    |    338,838 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 338,437 of 338,838    |
|    Dawn Flood to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: IT'S SO HOT THAT IT'S COLD!!!!!    |
|    11 Feb 26 10:26:02    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 2/11/2026 4:23 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 10/02/2026 à 19:03, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >>> CMIP climate models have been falsified when it has been observed       >>> that their output (all of them) doesn't match the observe       >>> (satellites, weather balloons) temperature evolution in 4 domains       >>> over a period of four decades.       >>> According to the scientific method (compare hypothesis with reality)       >>> those models are invalidated.       >>>       >>       >> No, they have not been invalidated.       >       > The predictions made with those models happened to not match observation       > over a 40 years period. Thus, they have been (all) invalidated.       >       > “Now I'm going to discuss how we would look for a new law.       > In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First we       > guess it. Well don't laugh that's really true. Then we compute the       > consequences of the guess to see, if this law that we guessed is right,       > what it would imply, and then we compare those computational results to       > nature (to experiment or experience). That is we compare it directly       > with observation to see if it works. If it disagrees with experiment,       > it's wrong.       > In that simple statement is the key to science.       > It doesn't make any difference how beautiful your guess is. It doesn't       > make any difference how smart you are who made the guess, or what your       > name is. If it disagrees with experiment it's wrong, that's all.”       > Richard Feynman                     Please stop quoting Richard Feynman; Professor Feynman is dead.              40 years is no different than ZERO years, as far as geological time is       concerned. Do you understand this??! At a minimum, anthropogenic       climate change is a DECADAL phenomenon, which means that with 40 years,       one has FOUR data points. Do you understand this?!              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca