XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/12/26 11:42 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   > Le 12/02/2026 à 20:45, Vincent Maycock a écrit :   
   >>> "Hot or "Cold" are only in relation to something   
   >>> else. Something can only be "Hot" in comparison to something else   
   >>> that is not. And you're a pathetic troll   
   >> Name one of your claims (either in this topic or elsewhere) that   
   >> you've made that align with standard science.  Or do you just thrive   
   >> on stupidity?   
   >   
   > "Standard Science" aligns with reality (observations). Let's take CMIP   
   > models. They don't align with reality.   
      
   Take a temperature. It's a number. That number can only be "Low"   
   in relation to a different number, just as it can only be "High"   
   in relation to a different number.   
      
   Call it "Data," if you want.   
      
   "Cold" is an interpretation. This is also known as "An opinion."   
      
   "Hot" is likewise an interpretation."   
      
   The temperature itself is just a number.   
      
   Compare the present to a cold period and you can interpret today's   
   number as "Hot."   
      
   Compare the present to a warm period and you can interpret today's   
   number as "Cold."   
      
   So the key here, whether or not your INTERPRETATION is based on   
   science or an agenda depends entirely upon HOW you are choosing   
   your number to compare the present to.   
      
   AGW bullshit cherry picks an obscenely inappropriate "Year 0" in   
   order to make the present look hot.   
      
   It's that simple.   
      
   "Hot" is an interpretation of a comparison of two numbers, and   
   those two numbers are pseudo scientific bullshit -- the "data"   
   is rigged to produce the results which were determined in advance.   
      
      
   We all know that conservation is good. Start with the 1%. They use   
   more energy, as individuals, than whole communities of us "Little   
   People."   
      
   More specific?  Start with banning all private aviation. If flying   
   First Class on a commercial airliner to "Going to far" for them,   
   telling us we can't fly at all is off the table forever.   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)