XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: PointedEars@web.de   
      
   jojo wrote:   
   > J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   >> jojo  wrote:   
   >>> he no believe in action at a distance.   
   >>   
   >> It was obvious after 1905 that Newtonian gravity   
   >> must be incorrect. (because non-relativistic)   
      
   That something was missing in that theory was already clear when, after   
   searching for it since ca. 1850, again no planet Vulcan (sic) was found to   
   explain Mercury's perihelion precession in the Crocker Expeditions of 1901,   
   1905, and 1908.   
      
   >> But it took another 10 years to find the correct replacement,   
   >   
   > there is a growing voice that fundamental physics has stalled   
   > since the 1980s.   
      
   Because for various reasons the percentage of people who have no clue about   
   science has been growing (as we can also see here), not because there is   
   anything wrong with the science.   
      
   > maybe with ai we can change that.   
      
   Replacing untrained idiots by trained idiots?  I doubt it.   
      
   --   
   PointedEars   
      
   Twitter: @PointedEars2   
   Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)