c30794ba   
   From: your.name@isp.com   
      
   "Mike Hall"  wrote in message   
   news:00a1075d-16d4-42d0-8bb6-a66e0692b488@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...   
   > On 17 Nov, 19:52, "Your Name"  wrote:   
   >   
   > > It aint "tough" at all. It's extremely easy. There's virtually zero   
   talent   
   > > or creativity in Hollyweird these days.   
   >   
   > Why do people think that the situation was ever different?  80% of all   
   > films ever released to the mass audience stank to high heaven!   
   > Another 19% had artistic merit but probably did not interest you   
   > personally for various reasons (too girly, too manly etc.).  Only   
   > about 1 or 2 films every year make me feel that I did not waste   
   > valuable lifetime watching it.  From what I have read the situation   
   > has never been different.  For years the studios were making money   
   > from "actors" making funny faces in silent movies!  Those who have an   
   > interest in keeping the myth alive call this a Golden Era in movie-   
   > making!   
      
   All true, but these days there's also very little actual creativity in   
   Hollyweird. Most of them simply clone someone else's good idea and / or   
   "remake" someone else's hard work into something barely recognisable while   
   still re-using the same old name.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)