66d75525   
   XPost: alt.politics, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.slack   
   From: peterduncanismyname@hotmail.com   
      
   "Don Stockbauer"  wrote in message   
   news:06ae0b00-85e2-4d2a-8f4a-6d1e0b165a2c@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...   
   On Jan 18, 12:01 am, RT  wrote:   
   > Anonymous Infidel - the anti-political talking head wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > > Nope. Wish them all the best...But I wont tolerate them   
   > > > > > > > > > pretending   
   > > > > > > > > > their religion is any better or that they have all the   
   > > > > > > > > > answers. [It   
   > > > > > > > > > isn't and they don't]   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > You just demonstrated that you have no idea what we believe.   
   > > > > > > > > Atheism is not a religion.   
   > > > > > > What, Atheist not willing to admit what everyone else already   
   > > > > > > knows?!?!?!? [There's a shocker]   
   >   
   > > > > > > > Nor does he understand the purpose of the Establishment   
   > > > > > > > Clause.   
   > > > > > > No I don't understand your version of it...The one where Atheist   
   > > > > > > zealots cram their religion down our throats and we're told we   
   > > > > > > can't   
   > > > > > > celebrate any other religion but that one. [Ever hear of the 1st   
   > > > > > > Amendment to the Constitution?]   
   >   
   > > > > > Which contains the Establishment cause.   
   > > > > Good job. [Now what does that amendment do?]   
   >   
   > > > You're welcome.   
   >   
   > > > > Hint: It's not the establishment of a state religion...Like you want   
   > > > > to Atheism to be.   
   >   
   > > > A Kentucky statute requiring the posting of a copy of the Ten   
   > > > Commandments,   
   > > > purchased with private contributions, on the wall of each public   
   > > > school   
   > > > classroom in the State has no secular legislative purpose, and   
   > > > therefore is   
   > > > unconstitutional as violating the Establishment Clause of the First   
   > > > Amendment.   
   > > So as usual the courts side with the religion of Atheism. [Which is   
   > > nothing new seeing as how they haven't given a shit about the US   
   > > Constitution(on anything) from day one]   
   >   
   > The courts have properly interpreted the clause to mean no government   
   > endorsement   
   > of any religion so that there is a level playing field for all. What is   
   > your   
   > interpretation of the clause ->   
   >   
   > > > Happy to educate you.   
   > > You only reaffirmed what I've been saying. [Three different religions   
   > > lost to the religion of atheism(De facto state religion)]   
   > > How weak is your faith...If a religious symbol, which this country was   
   > > founded on, threatens you? [Which commandment threatened your faith   
   > > the most?]   
   >   
   > Allowing this would be a government endorsement of a religion. Forbidden   
   > by the Constitution.   
      
   Which Constitution?  The ship?   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   don't bring Admiralty Law into this.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)