d15e0ea3   
   XPost: alt.politics, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.slack   
   From: zzz.zzz@qqq.net   
      
   Anonymous Infidel - the anti-political talking head got sick and threw   
   up all over the keyboard:   
      
   >> The courts have properly interpreted the clause to mean no government   
   endorsement of any religion   
   > Then why are they endorsing intolerant atheism? [Oh wait, It's because   
   > they can't afford the constant lawsuits that steal badly needed   
      
   Oh, wait, it's because they're not.   
      
   > resources from the sick and the poor. Which wouldn't happen if the   
   > Supreme Court would just take a stand on it once and for all]   
   >   
   > If we are to have freedom of religion...I want Christians, Jews,   
   > Hindu, Atheist, etc to be free to celebrate their faiths.   
      
   And you are not free to do this because...?   
      
   a)   
      
   b)   
      
   c)   
      
   d)   
      
   e)   
      
     I want   
   > diversity of thought. I want people to be allowed to be different.   
   > [Not be fired because some intolerant atheist asshole couldn't stand   
   > the fact they were wearing a cross, kappel, etc]   
      
   Of course, you have evidence for this bullshit? Post it here:   
      
      
   _____________________________________________________________   
      
      
      
   --   
   If you don't beat your meat   
   You can't have any pudding   
   How can you have any pudding   
   If you don't beat your meat?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)