ae5b92c2   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv   
   From: Obveeus@aol.com   
      
    wrote:   
      
   >Obveeus wrote:   
   >> That Zoe did not trust Clarice is not proof, IMO, that Clarice was the   
   >> one   
   >> targettting Zoe.   
      
   >Oh, I agree - indeed, as I've said to clouddreamer, I also think it a   
   >stretch at this point to suggest Zoe was a specific target. It does,   
   >however, counter the objection that Clarice wouldn't order Zoe killed   
   >without getting what she wanted if Zoe had made it as clear as it   
   >appears that she wasn't going to cooperate with Clarice. In that case,   
   >had Zoe been the target, Clarice has at least as much motive as   
   >Barnabus for disposing of her - after all, she was quick to take   
   >advantage of her absence to find a way to get at the software without   
   >Zoe setting roadblocks in her way.   
      
   I agree with that.  It just seems to be a dangerous step to take (killing   
   fleshy-Zoe) given that Clarice did not appear to be sure that fleshy-Zoe had   
   completed her avatar project yet.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)