From: cpd@cat.pan.net   
      
   "RT"  wrote in message   
   news:4BD4F4A2.700D4AB1@hotmMOVEail.com...   
   >   
   >> There is NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING out there to indicate that.   
   >   
   > Except for the fact of a battlestar itself.   
   >   
   >> Maybe they were. Who knows? That's just it. It's assumption on your part   
   >> but you tried to pass it off as fact.   
   >   
   > A very logical assumption.   
   >   
   > What else would you use a battlestar for?   
      
   What else would you use a base ship for?   
      
   >   
   >> The simple fact of the matter is that the base ships could have easily   
   >> been built to combat the battlestars.   
   >   
   > And what would you use the battlestars for if not for a similar opponent?   
      
   And what would you use the base ships for if not for a similar opponent?   
      
   It cuts both ways.  If there are no battlestars, why would the Cylons build   
   a base ship?  There is no "similar opponent" for the Cylons, so what use do   
   they have for building one?  Since they did build base ships, it is a "very   
   logical assumption" that they were built to combat the battlestars.   
      
   So which come first, da chicken or de egggggggggg?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)