From: your.name@isp.com
"Wouter Valentijn" wrote in message
news:4c98fd1b$0$41119$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> Your Name wrote:
> > In article <%AVlo.37909$Pn1.22839@newsfe14.iad>, Fred Ellis
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Searcher7 wrote:
> >>> I was a fan of the original Battlestar Galactica and wanted to catch
> >>> up on the newer version.
> >>>
> >>> I watched the disk set of the first season, the two disk sets for
> >>> the second season and I just finished watching the disk set for
> >>> season 3, and I'm waiting to get season 4. But there is some
> >>> confusion on whether or not I'm missing something.
> >>> Is Battlestar Galactica Razor important to the story lines or
> >>> should I skip it?
> >>>
> >>> Any ideas of what else I should plan on seeing would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> Yes, I suggest that you watch 'Razor'. It may not be all that
> >> important to the main story line, but it does fill in some of the
> >> back ground. You should watch it before watching Season 4. I also
> >> suggest that you watch 'The Plan' after you have seen Season 4.
> >
> > If you want the FULL story, you'll also have to play the computer game
> > which is based in the timeframe before the new (so-called) "Battlestar
> > Galactica" when, from memory, Adama was a fighter pilot ... but from
> > the screenshots the game has an overuse of lens flare making it look
> > unplaybale.
>
> Lens flare?
> Is the guy who made it related to someone attached to Abrams Trek?
No idea about Abrams' silly new (so-called) "Star Trek", but lens flare,
after decades of movie makers trying to reduce and remove real lens flare,
it is now apparently the latest new toy on the CGI block ... and it's
over-used, annoying, distracting, and simply wrong in most movies. The Star
Wars Prequel Trilogy also used it. :-(
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
