Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.battlestar-galactica    |    Worshipping this overlooked Scifi show    |    119,658 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 118,780 of 119,658    |
|    Jim Gysin to All    |
|    Re: 10 Things SyFy isn't telling you abo    |
|    16 Nov 10 21:22:32    |
      [continued from previous message]              > in thre movie theater.              We're talking television, not movies. Of course people are gonna expect       more eye candy when they're paying $12 for it.              >> It's the characters and the plotlines that end up getting the ongoing       >> discussion treatment, because (IMO) that's what matters most to most SF       >> fans.       >       > Then the people watching 'sci-fi' at the theater are not sci-fi fans...which       > goes back to the idea that sci-fi has a limited fanbase and no matter how       > good the shows are there isn't enough sci-fi viewership to support multiple       > channels.              *Every* genre has a limited fan base, but the initial numbers for shows       like LOST and FLASHFORWARD and THE EVENT tells us that the limit for the       SF genre is still a very impressive one if a show is done well. CAPRICA       only draws 700,000 because it's crap, not because it's cutting-edge and       quality SF that's written for an audience base that maxes out at 701,000.              >> A second and current example is the many WALKING DEAD threads here in the       >> past few weeks. In them, I think that there have been a handful of       >> references to the makeup effects and the like. Everything else has been       >> about the story lines, the characters, their motivations, their choices,       >> etc.       >       > ...or mostly the discussion has been about how stupid the characters are,       > how illogical the plotline is, and how campy the entire comic book result is       > on screen.              All of which are considerations that are equally immune to the expense       of special effects eye candy, and all of which speak to problems related       to a lack of quality in the writing versus problems related to cheap       effects or a lack of interest from the potential audience base. Bottom       line: quality and inexpensive television SF is possible, and there is an       audience out there for it.              --       Jim Gysin       Waukesha, WI              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca