From: jeff.jenson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this   
      
     To: alt.battlestar-galactica   
      
   nobody wrote:   
   > On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:54:21 -0400, Bryan wrote:   
   >   
   > > nobody wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:37:17 -0400, Bryan wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>>nobody wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>[quoted text muted]   
   > >>>   
   > >>>by your own sick definition this helps the survival of the raped not the   
   > >>>rapist. your argument fails.   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> no one ever gets out of life alive :) the only path to imortality is your   
   > >> children whether their mother wanted them or wanted you as the father or   
   > >> not . :)   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > > doesn't matter the rape did not ensure the survival of the rapist.   
   >   
   > but may have insured the passing along of his genes. Though admitatly the   
   > rapist is not concerned about this point during the point of rape. Rape is   
   > not about sex or about propigation of the species it is about having power   
   > and domination over another human being.   
      
   That is also what the interogator wants. So if by raping the prisoner   
   the interogator can get vital information, then that would be   
   acceptable.   
      
   One of the reasons I do not perfer rape as an interogation technique is   
   because of the whole impregnation thing.   
      
   ---   
    * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out   
   free usenet!   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92   
   Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)