Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.battlestar-galactica    |    Worshipping this overlooked Scifi show    |    119,658 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,505 of 119,658    |
|    Clu to Gatuzo    |
|    Re: When the Sequel for    |
|    15 Dec 15 11:13:12    |
      From: drclu@swbell.net              On 11/16/15 7:02 PM, Gatuzo wrote:       > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----              > I thinks After the 80' , Hollywood have no more Imagination and all       > the crap now a reply of old movies or garbige       >       > I remember about that and do not See like a Sequel of it , it was BAD       > BAD !!              G80 (Galactica 1980) is enjoyable enough to watch on it's own. It is       like a comedy with Battlestar Galactica trappings. I think the       cyclones would make good ground roving vehicles, but should never have       flown.              Oh well. "In name only" is a term used a lot since the New Battlestar       came out. Luckily Doctor Who learned from this mistake and did not       ignore the past.              As for Star Trek, they started off saying "Ok the whole other universe       happened, this is a new universe." That was excellent. However with       the new trailer looking like "Star Trek the Fast and the Furious" well,       it looks like the new Trek is Trek in name only as well.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca