Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.battlestar-galactica    |    Worshipping this overlooked Scifi show    |    119,660 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,659 of 119,660    |
|    Your Name to MummyChunk    |
|    Re: TV Reboot Still MIA, Finale Discours    |
|    28 Feb 26 10:48:03    |
      From: YourName@YourISP.com              On 2026-02-27 18:08:41 +0000, MummyChunk said:              > If anyone's still checking in every few months to see whether the Sam       > Esmail Battlestar project ever escaped development purgatory, there's       > still nothing resembling a real green light. The last meaningful       > movement was that Peacock dropped it and it was supposedly going to be       > shopped elsewhere, but since then it's basically been radio silence in       > terms of a network actually picking it up and putting it on a schedule.       > At this point it feels less like "when" and more like "if," which is a       > shame because the franchise is one of the few that could come back       > without feeling like nostalgia cosplay if the writing is there.       >       > Meanwhile, the old arguments about the ending are having another little       > flare up, because people are circulating George R R Martin's comments       > about the finale again. It's funny how that never really goes away. For       > a lot of viewers, the show is still an all time great that just didn't       > stick the landing in a way that matched the earlier seasons. For       > others, the ending is thematically consistent and the problem is more       > about pacing and execution than the idea itself. Personally, the reason       > it stays a debate is because the show set an insanely high bar for       > grounded, messy, political sci fi and then asked people to accept a       > very different kind of resolution at the end. Whether that works       > probably depends on what you wanted the story to be about in the first       > place.       >       > The one actually concrete Battlestar thing on the horizon right now is       > the new game Battlestar Galactica Scattered Hopes. It's got a planned       > release window of Q2 2026, and what they've shown so far looks like       > it's trying to blend fleet survival management with more direct combat       > than the usual strategy layer games. That could be great or it could       > end up feeling like it can't decide whether it wants to be tense and       > desperate or just a laser show, but at least it's something new in the       > universe that isn't trapped in rights and meetings.       >       > So that's where things stand today. No real TV revival news, the finale       > discourse is immortal, and the game is the only thing with a calendar       > attached. If a new series did happen, would people here even want it in       > the same continuity as the 2004 show, or is the only way forward a hard       > reset with a new tone.              The only *true* "Battlestar Galactica" is the original created by Glen       A. Larson version. Moore-Ron's awful in-name-only "reboot" is       irrelevant garbage as will be any follow-on or another idiotic "reboot"       version.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca