From: gangrif@mindless.com   
      
   Yea, i get it.   
   door's on wg seem to suck though.   
   its just frustrating sometimes, i like wg, i'm getting to know it pretty   
   well too, and i like what i see, most of the time, but some stuff is   
   just... well.. dumb.  Why's it have to be so difficult to run 2 copies   
   of the same game? Its simple to do it with door games on other bbs's,   
   why can wg do it too... hmph..   
      
   anyway, thanks for the replies.   
      
   Do you get the feeling that you and I are the only one's who read this   
   group anymore too?   
      
      
   Corey wrote:   
      
   >   To: Nathan   
   >   Re: Re: Running multiple copies of a module on WG2.0   
   >   By: Nathan to alt.bbs.majorbbs on Thu Nov 11 2004 06:07 pm   
   >   
   >  > From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.majorbbs   
   >  >   
   >  > Great, so tell me again, why was WB/Mbbs so popular?  expensive,   
   >  > proprietary, and very limited expandability.......   
   >  >   
   >  >   
   >  > Corey wrote:   
   >  > >   To: Nathan   
   >  > >   Re: Running multiple copies of a module on WG2.0   
   >  > >   By: Nathan to alt.bbs.majorbbs on Thu Nov 11 2004 04:57 pm   
   >  > > n   
   >  > >   
   >  > >  > From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.majorbbs   
   >  > >  >   
   >  > >  > Is there any way to run two or more copies of the same module (say, a   
   >  > >  > game) on a single WGBBS system? Each configurable on its own.   
   >  > >  >   
   >  > >  > Thanks.   
   >  > >  >   
   >  > >  > --- Synchronet 3.12a-Win32 NewsLink 1.76   
   >  > >   
   >  > > there was a hack for majormud I saw once.   
   >  > > normally no, becuase the two moduals would clash resources and stuff.   
   >  > >   
   >  > > Fr Corey Blake OSB   
   >  > >   
   >  > > "Photons have mass!!?? I didn't even know they were Catholic..."   
   >  > >   
   >  > >   
   >  > > --- Synchronet 3.12a-Win32 NewsLink 1.76   
   >  > > From The Three Stooges Gentlemens Club   
   >  >   
   >  > --- Synchronet 3.12a-Win32 NewsLink 1.76   
   >   
   > it was ahead of it's time.   
   > no one else could touch it back then for performance.   
   > it was fast.   
   > you could do over 128 lines on a 386 computer with 16 megs of ram.   
   > while most everyone else was multinode, it was multiline.   
   > for a multinode bbs to even come close to a mbbs system you needed   
   > a huge room of computers on a fast network, like netware or lantastic.   
   > it's only even near competitor was Tbbs, and they are dead too.   
   > and they cost about the same also.   
   > Mbbs and Tbbs had special games none of the multinode systems had.   
   > shall I go on?   
   >   
   > Fr Corey Blake OSB   
   >   
   > "Photons have mass!!?? I didn't even know they were Catholic..."   
   >   
   > --- Synchronet 3.12a-Win32 NewsLink 1.76   
   > From The Three Stooges Gentlemens Club   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)