Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.bbs.mystic    |    Mystic Sysops are mystical nerds...    |    11,842 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,810 of 11,842    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to you    |
|    Re: Is this thing on?    |
|    17 Apr 22 21:41:25    |
      From: nospam.Wilfred.van.Velzen@f464.n280.z2.fidonet.org              Hi Nicholas,              On 2022-04-17 09:00:40, you wrote to me:               NB>>> Not sure what to tell you. Anything I write should leave here to        NB>>> all links at roughly the same time. Does the order of callouts        NB>>> have anything to do with how you list nodes in binkd.conf? If so,        NB>>> my list starts with 1: and 2: is further down the list in        NB>>> numerical order. Otherwise, who knows.               WV>> It of course depends on in what order your tosser presents the files        WV>> to binkd. But besides that it should handle most of the outgoing mail        WV>> in parallel, unless you have your maxclients set to a low value...               WV>> But your log should be able to tell you what happend (if you're        WV>> interested enough ;-))...               NB> Besides what is already out in the open, the other things I can think of        NB> is        NB> (1) an issue that I'm in the process of resolving is that 301/1 connects        NB> here about 1500 times per day, and roughly 1450 of them are failed        NB> connections.. This I can't really do anything about until I get a        NB> response,        NB> and (2) with over 100 links, if 1 or more of them are down and maxclients        NB> is set to a low number, it delays as long as it takes for the connection        NB> to        NB> timeout - which can also hold things up quite a bit. Every once in awhile        NB> I        NB> look into this and remove dead or unresponsive links. What else more can I        NB> say?              This sounds like a very plausible cause for what I've seen happening.               NB> I don't remember why I originally set my maxclients to a lower value,        NB> but something not happening the way I wanted it to in the past made me        NB> do it. That said, I've raised it for now to see if it makes things        NB> faster. However, if I start having other issues because of it.. 4        NB> minutes in transit is still better than a week or more via snail mail.        NB> ;)              Indeed... I just found it odd. In the end it doesn't really matter if mail       comes in via another longer route, as long as it comes in... ;-)              Bye, Wilfred.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca