XPost: alt.config, alt.bbs.enthral   
   From: spot@tioat.net   
      
   Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   > Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >>Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >>>>Peter J Ross wrote:   
   >>>>>Brian Mailman  wrote:   
   >>>>>>Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>>>You sent two more newgroup messages, this time with correct syntax on   
   >>>>>>>the required headers.   
   >   
   >>>>>>Our work here is done.   
   >   
   >>>>>There might be a possibility of retro-chartering, if the proponent is   
   >>>>>still interested.   
   >   
   >>>>Whatever, stupid. The charter for that newsgroup shall be determined   
   >>>>by the active subscribers... and no one else. Period.   
   >   
   >>>Uh, no. The active posters (subscribers would include lurkers) deterine   
   >>>what's topical. The charter is the author's alone.   
   >   
   >>It's nice to know you have a sense of humor. So, yes, even lurkers   
   >>own the charter of a newsgroup they subscribe to. Or did I mistake   
   >>ignorance for humor? No, it must be humor. You know and should now   
   >>acknowledge that in the alt groups, which are not administered by   
   >>bambies or controlled by net.good-ol-boy, a newsgroup charter is a   
   >>dynamic thing and shall be determined by the active posters... and   
   >>lurkers... to a particular newsgroup... and no one else. Period.   
   >   
   > What you just wrote is completely stupid.   
      
   You three wise men, Adam, Peter and Brian, need to let this go. The   
   control message for alt.bbs.enthral was sent and received by all   
   usenet servers. All that remains now is for the group to be added to   
   servers and become active. The charter shall be revised as needed   
   by the active subscribers to that newsgroup. So just leave them the   
   fuck alone and move on to something else.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)