XPost: alt.config, alt.bbs.enthral, alt.usenet.kooks   
   From: spot@tioat.net   
      
   Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   > DAB  wrote:   
   >>Kelb tal-Fenek wrote:   
   >>>Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >>>>>Peter J Ross wrote:   
   >>>>>>Brian Mailman  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>>>>You sent two more newgroup messages, this time with correct   
   >>>>>>>>syntax on the required headers.   
   >   
   >>>>>>>Our work here is done.   
   >   
   >>>>>>There might be a possibility of retro-chartering, if the proponent   
   >>>>>>is still interested.   
   >   
   >>>>>Whatever, stupid. The charter for that newsgroup shall be determined   
   >>>>>by the active subscribers... and no one else. Period.   
   >   
   >>>>Uh, no. The active posters (subscribers would include lurkers)   
   >>>>deterine what's topical. The charter is the author's alone.   
   >   
   >>>It's nice to know you have a sense of humor. So, yes, even lurkers   
   >>>own the charter of a newsgroup they subscribe to. Or did I mistake   
   >>>ignorance for humor? No, it must be humor. You know and should now   
   >>>acknowledge that in the alt groups, which are not administered by   
   >>>bambies or controlled by net.good-ol-boy, a newsgroup charter is a   
   >>>dynamic thing and shall be determined by the active posters... and   
   >>>lurkers... to a particular newsgroup... and no one else. Period.   
   >   
   >>If you ever run for some kinda office you got my vote!  I like assertive   
   >>men.....are you married?  If not I will drop the ring off the list and we   
   >>can just live in sin ;-)   
   >   
   > Good grief. This is so much a violation of Databasix AUP/TOS, I really   
   > just don't know where to begin. Albert Jacher, where are you?   
      
   Adam H. Kerman, you are a kook.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)