XPost: alt.config, alt.bbs.enthral   
   From: spot@tioat.net   
      
   Frank Linhares wrote:   
   > Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >> Frank Linhares  wrote:   
   >>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>> Frank Linhares  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> Do you want to hear about the errors, or don't you care?   
   >>   
   >>>>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:38:45 -0500   
   >>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:38:43 -0400   
   >>   
   >>>> Your system clock is off by an hour.   
   >>   
   >> Whoops! I misread 22: as 23: . Sorry about that. Never mind.   
   >>   
   >>>>> From: Frank Linhares    
   >>>>> Reply-To: frank@no.spam.bbs-scene.org   
   >>   
   >>>> Do you know what the purpose of Reply-To is? It's NOT to repeat the   
   >>>> address on From. If you're not changing the address, you don't use   
   >>>> Reply-To. Typically it's used in Mail when you're sending a message from   
   >>>> a network on which you don't have an account.   
   >>   
   >>>>> Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.bbs.enthral   
   >>   
   >>>> I told you specifically that newgroup messages are sent to the group   
   >>>> being created. It doesn't matter all that much what newsgroup is put on   
   >>>> the Newsgroups header. Crossposting will not improve propagation, but   
   >>>> using the group being creating helps with screening.   
   >>   
   >>>> Several of the FAQs are wrong on this point, but why listen to anything   
   >>>> you're told in alt.config?   
   >>   
   >>>>> Followup-To: poster   
   >>   
   >>>> If there must be a followup, it's in alt.config. How, exactly, did you   
   >>>> expect this header to work with your munged email addess domain?   
   >>   
   >>>>> Subject: cmsg newgroup alt.bbs.enthral   
   >>   
   >>>>> For your newsgroups file:   
   >>>>> alt.bbs.enthral   Support and discussion of the Enthral BBS package   
   >>   
   >>>> Support, discussion, and package are not key words and do not belong in   
   >>>> the description. Enthral and BBS repeat words from the group name.   
   >>   
   >>>>> CHARTER: alt.bbs.enthral discusses support, feature requests, and bug   
   >>>>> reports of the enthral bbs system.  The discussion will also spill over   
   >>>>> into general bbs technology.   
   >>   
   >>>>> JUSTIFICATION: A scan of Google Groups shows a very limited discussion   
   >>>>> of Enthral.  As of today only 15 messages have been posted.   
   >>   
   >>>> Was it within the last 90 days? Was enthral the main topic, or merely   
   >>>> mentioned incidentally? How many different users were there writing about   
   >>>> Enthral as a main topic of the message? Were any of the messages full   
   >>>> text quotes of an article from another medium?   
   >>   
   >>>> Did you read any of them?   
   >>   
   >>>> If you still don't know the answers to any of those questions, which are   
   >>>> very much like the questions Brian was trying to get you to think about,   
   >>>> how the hell can you promote the group?   
   >>   
   >>>>> The software is very new and the interest of a wide spread has popped   
   >>>>> up in various messaging networks.  A central location of discussion on   
   >>>>> usenet has been agreed upon by the developers since it's the best and   
   >>>>> most wide spread messaging network of them all.   
   >>   
   >>>> None of this is justification, so what is it doing in that section?   
   >>   
   >>>>> This second   
   >>   
   >>>> Third.   
   >>   
   >>>>> control message has been sent as a retro-charter in an   
   >>>>> effort to fix the mistake of what was thought to be a test control   
   >>>>> message sent late last week.   
   >>   
   >>>> What the fuck is it with you and apologizing?   
   >>   
   >>>>> Thank You.   
   >>   
   >>>> No.   
   >>   
   >>> Ummmm thanks for your comments but you can wipe your ass with them.  If   
   >>> you don't like it, don't read it dick head.   
   >>   
   >> Unless and until you go away and start promoting the group, I'll   
   >> continue to make comments. You don't need anyone's permission to keep   
   >> fucking up, and I don't need anyone's permission to comment.   
   >   
   > And I have no intentions of going anywhere, just like you clearly don't   
   > need my permission to be a fucking dickhead, your doing just fine on   
   > your own.   
      
   Adam is correct on some of these technical details and it might be   
   possible to learn from him if you were not correct in the fact that   
   he is a fucking dickhead. I advise not reminding him of that too   
   often because it only strokes his ego; he takes pride in being a   
   fucking dickhead. Trust me. ;)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)