XPost: alt.config, alt.bbs.enthral   
   From: spot@tioat.net   
      
   Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   > Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >>Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>Here's something that hasn't been discussed. There was another   
   >>>>newgroup sent around the same time as the one we are discussing and   
   >>>>the resident rmgrouper let it slide. There was no discussion in   
   >>>>alt.config or a justification. Nothing said. Now, the one where the   
   >>>>proponent decides to talk about it in alt.config is fucking   
   >>>>nitpicked to death here. Why is this?   
   >   
   >>>Usenet isn't fair. Meow.   
   >   
   >>Nonsense, humor or dogma. Take your pick.   
   >   
   > It's a saying. Gawd, yer thick.   
   >   
   >>Whichever it may be, it is easy to understand why some choose not to   
   >>discuss newsgroup creation in alt.config.   
   >   
   > It'll be impossible for you to explain your point, as you've utterly   
   > failed to appreciate what took place here. Again, for your benefit as   
   > you obviously didn't read it, the proponent DID NOT choose to discuss   
   > the charter he wrote. The proponent DID NOT choose to discuss   
   > justification. The proponent DID NOT choose to discuss a final draft of   
   > a newgroup message before he sent it, not any of the three times.   
   >   
   > The proponent made all those choices, all by himself. None of his   
   > actions had anything to do with what I or anyone else said to him.   
   >   
   > Is your thinking process so muddled that you didn't recall the sequence   
   > of events? I know putting actual thought into things could make your   
   > head explode, so don't bother.   
      
   No need now to explain; your reply says it all. You may not get it.   
   Others will. Someone should post a "Keep out! Beware of Dog!" sign   
   at the entrance to alt config. Fucking mad dogs.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)