XPost: alt.config, alt.bbs.enthral   
   From: spot@tioat.net   
      
   pandora wrote:   
   > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:30:15 +0000, Kelb tal-Fenek wrote:   
   >   
   >> Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>> Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >>>>Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>>Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>Here's something that hasn't been discussed. There was another   
   >>>>>>newgroup sent around the same time as the one we are discussing and   
   >>>>>>the resident rmgrouper let it slide. There was no discussion in   
   >>>>>>alt.config or a justification. Nothing said. Now, the one where the   
   >>>>>>proponent decides to talk about it in alt.config is fucking nitpicked   
   >>>>>>to death here. Why is this?   
   >>>   
   >>>>>Usenet isn't fair. Meow.   
   >>>   
   >>>>Nonsense, humor or dogma. Take your pick.   
   >>>   
   >>> It's a saying. Gawd, yer thick.   
   >>>   
   >>>>Whichever it may be, it is easy to understand why some choose not to   
   >>>>discuss newsgroup creation in alt.config.   
   >>>   
   >>> It'll be impossible for you to explain your point, as you've utterly   
   >>> failed to appreciate what took place here. Again, for your benefit as   
   >>> you obviously didn't read it, the proponent DID NOT choose to discuss   
   >>> the charter he wrote. The proponent DID NOT choose to discuss   
   >>> justification. The proponent DID NOT choose to discuss a final draft of   
   >>> a newgroup message before he sent it, not any of the three times.   
   >>>   
   >>> The proponent made all those choices, all by himself. None of his   
   >>> actions had anything to do with what I or anyone else said to him.   
   >>>   
   >>> Is your thinking process so muddled that you didn't recall the sequence   
   >>> of events? I know putting actual thought into things could make your   
   >>> head explode, so don't bother.   
   >>   
   >> No need now to explain; your reply says it all. You may not get it. Others   
   >> will. Someone should post a "Keep out! Beware of Dog!" sign at the   
   >> entrance to alt config. Fucking mad dogs.   
   >   
   > Not at all.  Merely individuals trying to help proponents of new groups to   
   > get it right the first time.   
      
   I'm sure these individual are trying to help and the help is free to   
   anyone interested. I get the feeling that some may still be living   
   in a past era when universities provided access to usenet. The good   
   old days. Yes, when usenet was at DEFCON 1. I'm thinking maybe we   
   could relax that level of readiness just a tad.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)