XPost: alt.config, alt.bbs.enthral   
   From: spot@tioat.net   
      
   pandora wrote:   
   > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:13:14 +0000, Kelb tal-Fenek wrote:   
   >   
   >> Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>> Kelb tal-Fenek  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Here's something that hasn't been discussed. There was another newgroup   
   >>>>sent around the same time as the one we are discussing and the resident   
   >>>>rmgrouper let it slide. There was no discussion in alt.config or a   
   >>>>justification. Nothing said. Now, the one where the proponent decides to   
   >>>>talk about it in alt.config is fucking nitpicked to death here. Why is   
   >>>>this?   
   >>>   
   >>> Usenet isn't fair. Meow.   
   >>   
   >> Nonsense, humor or dogma. Take your pick.   
   >>   
   >> Whichever it may be, it is easy to understand why some choose not to   
   >> discuss newsgroup creation in alt.config.   
   >   
   > It would behoove them to do so, IMO, IF they wish to a) get some   
   > information regarding the creation of a new newsgroup and b) get it right   
   > before sending a control message.   
      
   Just a wild guess but I would assume most proponents that find their   
   way to alt.config are adults. They should be treated as adults and   
   respected.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)