Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.bible.prophecy    |    Debating whatever bible prophecies    |    115,083 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 113,342 of 115,083    |
|    Michael Ejercito to HeartDoc Andrew    |
|    Re: (Catherine) Greeting Michael Ejercit    |
|    01 Oct 24 18:49:11    |
      XPost: sci.med.cardiology, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc       XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife       From: MEjercit@HotMail.com              HeartDoc Andrew wrote:       > Michael Ejercito wrote:       >       >> https://archive.vn/jW1LE       >>       >>       >> NHS wants to sedate Down’s syndrome patient for Covid jab against       >> mother’s will       >> Mother of patient describes ‘covert’ spiking of drinks as ‘tantamount       to       >> assault’ and breach of human rights       >>       >>       >> The patient is the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders       >> because he 'lacks capacity' and cannot make decisions for himself       >> The patient is the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders       >> because he ‘lacks capacity’ and cannot make decisions for himself       >> Steve Bird       >> 28 September 2024 4:26pm       >> A mother has launched a legal battle to stop the state from spiking her       >> Down’s syndrome son’s drinks with sedatives so he can be jabbed with the       >> Covid vaccine, The Telegraph can reveal.       >> Cups of tea and glasses of orange juice have been secretly laced with       >> sedatives to subdue the man, in his thirties, so he can be given the       >> vaccine and booster jabs.       >> But his mother now is planning to prosecute her local NHS integrated       >> care board (ICB) for “forced vaccination”, which she claims is       >> “tantamount to assault” and a breach of his human rights.       >> Adam, whose name has been changed because he cannot be identified, is       >> the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders because he “lacks       >> capacity” and cannot make decisions for himself.       >> His ICB, which also cannot be named, obtained a court order in 2021       >> allowing the “covert” spiking so he can be given the AstraZeneca       vaccine.       >> The court concluded the vaccine was in Adam’s “best interests” because       >> he is in a “clinical risk group” due to his learning disabilities,       >> autism, Down’s syndrome and obesity.       >> The method of sedating him via a drink was chosen because it “avoids the       >> use of restraint or physical force” and overcomes Adam’s needle phobia,       >> legal papers seen by The Telegraph explain.       >> Catherine, his mother, is fighting a fresh application made by the ICB       >> to allow care home staff to administer sedation and vaccines without       >> having to seek court approval each time the Government issues new       >> vaccine guidance.       >> ‘The pandemic is over’       >> “The pandemic is over and Covid is now treated as little more than the       >> common cold,” his mother, who is in her 60s and from the home counties,       >> said. “But my son is being categorised as at the same risk as those with       >> life-threatening diseases.       >> “It is terrifying that this is happening years after the pandemic and at       >> a time when we are not required to wear masks or socially distance.       >> “As Adam’s mother, I know what is best for him. I think this excessive       >> state intervention is unfair, particularly now the Covid landscape has       >> changed so drastically.”       >> The mother and her legal team have set up a crowdfunding campaign called       >> “Stop Sedate-to-Vaccinate” to raise funds for her to fight the NHS       >> application for “forced medical treatments”.       >> A court previously heard that Adam struggled to follow social distancing       >> rules because he liked to “hug” people.       >> His carers, including his doctor and a solicitor assigned by the court       >> to represent him, believe he needs the vaccine because Government       >> guidelines classify him as vulnerable due to his “chronic neurological       >> disease”.       >> Benefits outweigh risks       >> The 2021 ruling by Judge Brown concluded that although Adam “finds       >> health interventions distressing” the benefits of the vaccine “far       >> outweigh the risks”.       >> But his mother, a devout Christian, claims administering the vaccine       >> “against his will” has meant he “will not be able to trust people and       >> his life will be filled with fear”, adding that it amounts “to unlawful       >> use of restraint.”       >> She also claims he has lost weight and “is healthier than the average       >> person” who “hardly gets a cold” and has already had Covid which was       mild.       >> The judge concluded she was in no position to rule on the efficacy of       >> the vaccine or some of the other theories about it which were based on       >> “extraordinary and dangerous misinformation”.       >> In her ruling allowing the initial vaccination, Judge Brown wrote how       >> she understood “genuine and legitimate concern from some, about the       >> administering of a new vaccine to combat a new virus”, adding how some       >> people “legitimately and in good faith, raise questions about its       >> efficacy and possible side effects.”       >> ‘Waste of public money’       >> The mother’s lawyer, Stephen Jackson of Jackson Osborne Solicitors, said       >> Adam’s four years of good health without vaccination since the pandemic       >> “speaks volumes for his natural immune system.”       >> “This is a scandalous waste of public money. The Joint Committee on       >> Vaccination and Immunisation assesses they need to jab approximately       >> 10,500 people like Adam to avoid just one non-severe visit to the hospital.       >> “At £25 a shot, that’s £262,000 that could be better spent, leave       aside       >> the cost of these proceedings.”       >> A spokesman for the UK Health Security Agency, the government body       >> responsible for public health protection, said it would be       >> “inappropriate” to comment on a specific case.       >> He added: “Vaccination is voluntary on the basis of informed consent.       >> Where an adult is unable to consent for themselves it is a matter for       >> their doctors to consider their best interests in collaboration with       >> relatives.”       >> The integrated care board, which insists Adam’s sedation and vaccination       >> are legal, declined to comment “because of patient confidentiality”.       >> The case will be heard at the Court of Protection in November.       >> Inside the secret sedation plot       >> As a “thank you” for having a mug of breakfast tea and a glass of orange       >> juice brought into his room, Adam invariably hugged the staff he trusts       >> so implicitly at his care home.       >> Unbeknown to him, on five separate occasions over the last 16 months       >> those drinks were laced with a “covert anxiolytic medication” – a       >> powerful sedative. Twice he became groggy before eventually succumbing       >> to a deep sleep.       >> Each time, a team of senior carers, a nurse and the home’s manager stood       >> quietly outside the room awaiting the nod to enter. One of them was              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca