Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.bible.prophecy    |    Debating whatever bible prophecies    |    115,092 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 114,609 of 115,092    |
|    Michael Ejercito to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?_=e2=80=9cNever_Mind!=e2=80=9d    |
|    04 Jun 25 19:00:48    |
      XPost: sci.med.cardiology, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel       XPost: uk.legal       From: MEjercit@HotMail.com              https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/06/04/never-mind-the-axis-media-sp       eads-hamas-anti-israel-propaganda-and-there-are-no-consequences/              “Never Mind!” The Axis Media Spreads Hamas Anti-Israel Propaganda, and       There Are No Consequences       June 4, 2025 / Jack Marshall                     The Washington Post last night retracted its story misrepresenting an       incident in Gaza. The Post, like most of the news media, falsely claimed       that Israel killed 30 Gazan civilians who were just trying to get some       food (you know, the “Aww, poor Palestinians, still being persecuted by       those evil Jews!” narrative).              The Post’s statement was posted on X rather than on its website, and       announced that the paper had “deleted the post below because it and       early versions of the article didn’t meet Post fairness standards.”       That’s another lie, as it is pure deceit. The story had to be deleted       because it was false and should not have been published in the first       place. Yes, false news stories are unfair, but that’s a secondary problem.              Palestinian Arab sources had spread the claim that an Israeli strike       near a humanitarian aid distribution center resulted in at least 30       deaths and numerous injuries. The international media outlets didn’t       consider the source, and leaped to the conclusion that Israel was       committing war crimes.              Later that same day, the IDF released the findings of its initial       investigation into the incident. These findings indicated that the IDF       did not fire at civilians while they were near or within the       humanitarian aid distribution site, and that the reports being       circulated as fact by media outlets were false. Yet even after the story       had been discredited, CNN and MSNBC (among others) continued to stick       with the original. anti-Israel spin. I saw this in real time: a Fox News       guest told viewers that the report had been debunked, and at exactly the       same time, the two Axis networks were repeating the original account.              The IDF again called on the media to be cautious with information       published by the Hamas terrorist organization. Gee, ya think? But they       aren’t careful and don’t want to be careful. They want to back the       Democratic Party’s position that Israel is the villain for reacting to       an unprovoked terrorist attack exactly as the United Sates would (and       has): by crushing the attacker and ensuring that the actions could never       be repeated.              Saying “Oopsie! Never mind!” does not undo the damage caused by the       original false reporting. That the Post and other media outlets would       accept without confirmation a Hamas narrative shows where their       confirmation bias lies, and why they are no longer trustworthy.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca