XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 26, 2025, zebrabible@proton.me wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 18:51:31 -0700, None  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 23, 2025, zebrabible@proton.me wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 23:59:34 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 17, 2025, zebrabible@proton.me wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > John 1:1 supplement   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > (John 1:1) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,   
   > > > > > and the Word was a god. (NWT)   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > -- King James   
   > > > > > John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,   
   > > > > > and the Word was God.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Jhn 1:2 He was in the beginning with God.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > This is not speaking of Jesus being born as a human, not at all.   
   > > >   
   > > > This is speaking of Jesus the moment he was created. (Col 1:15)   
   > >   
   > > I replied to all your lies which includes all your half truths in another   
   > > NG.   
   >   
   > This liar always gives you full Bible truths. (Ro 10:14,15)   
      
   Just like Satan did to Jesus.   
   >   
   >   
   > >   
   > > If your JW wife were to commit adultery with another man, but tell you the   
   > > whole time she did it, she was thinking of you, and doing with him what she   
   > > did for you, and so that was her ’truth’ according the the JW dogma of   
   > > what truth is, would you accept that as truth also and go along with if for   
   > > the foreseeable future, when she then transfer that truth for a ’newer’   
   > > truth?   
   >   
   > Yes, I would probably believe her, but not go along with it. Adultery   
   > is a sin. (James 2:11)   
      
   Yet her truth was that she was doing it with you. Therefore not adultery.   
      
   The woman would have been following all the principles of JW Dogma.   
   You, believing her, would have to go along with her on this, until she can   
   see it otherwise.   
   That is your argument for believing “new truths” yet never admitting that   
   your previous “truths” were lies and deceitful.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > As for a newer truth, the true religion continues upgrades until the end.   
      
   Thus you cannot divorce her when she upgrades to a better truth that is more   
   pleasing to her.   
   > As Proverbs says about Bible truth:   
   >   
   > -- King James   
   > Proverbs 4:18 But the path of the just is as the shining light, that   
   > shineth more and more unto the perfect day.   
      
   That light is light. Bright or dim it is the same light. The source changes   
   not. The light changes not.   
   It was also speaking of the path of the Just. Who amongst the JW is 'Just’?   
      
   >   
   >   
   > A light that starts out dim, but keeps getting brighter and brighter,   
   > shows a change taking place. And that is what the JW organization   
   > does.   
      
   What change? It, as the scripture said was a Shining Light. Not a Dim one.   
   >   
   >   
   > Sincerely James   
   >   
   > >   
   > > Of such thinking is the JW towards God.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)