XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Oct 1, 2025, James wrote   
   (Message-ID:<6ebqdkt6hijh3l1g4jt54mt4754flrjgf9@4ax.com>):   
      
   > On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:52:20 -0700, None  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 29, 2025, James wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2025 18:33:00 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 28, 2025, James wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > An AI's response to what a soul is.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Where does AI end and your comments begin?   
   > > >   
   > > > Look for the quotation marks.   
   > >   
   > > If that be the case then the only thing quoted nothing you wrote is to be   
   > > trusted here, since you used quotation marks around your question, unless   
   > > you   
   > > are an AI entity and many other quotation marks around various words.   
   >   
   > I didn't put quotation marks around my own opinion of something. Look   
   > again. I do put them around single words I want to stand out, like   
   > "soul".   
      
   No joke, and that is what I references and in another post broke up spur   
   original post not the two parts, and clearly specified each on. The subject   
   you typed referred to the whole post. Which is why I asked you to clarify   
   what was and what wan not.   
   >   
   >   
   > What the AI printed out started with the question I asked it.   
   >   
   > I also put quotation marks around words I quote from the Bible. Like   
   > part of Genesis 2:7 "the breath of life".   
   >   
   > >   
   > > So how about being more definitive?   
   > >   
   > > To me the bulk of your text was generated by the mantra of the JW’s   
   dogma.   
   >   
   > Wrong. What I said the AI said, all came from the AI. Pose my exact   
   > question on the internet and see if you get an AI. Here is the   
   > question I asked:   
      
   Oh REALLY??? Now you are opposing your statements.   
   >   
   >   
   > "What does the Bible say a "soul" is? [quotations were used so that it   
   > would treat it as one sentence instead of a bunch of individual   
   > words.]   
   >   
   > But what is interesting is that you mainly are commenting on my use of   
   > grammar, rather than what it said a soul is. It fully agreed with what   
   > I have been posting. The AI checked a bunch of references, and came up   
   > with that.   
      
   So AI Justified your beliefs and not God. Ask it if it is sharper than a two   
   edged sword in things spiritual.   
   >   
   >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > > What is the Greek word for soul that the Hebrews used to translate from   
   > > > > ancient Hebrew to Greek?   
   > > > Psyche.   
   > >   
   > > ????? psuche?, this is the greek word for soul translated 300 years   
   > > before Christ came to earth.   
   > > Which, BTW you misspelled throughout your post.   
   >   
   > That is the way my reference spells it.   
      
   Correct which is why I point it out that AI did not post those comments, you   
   did.   
   >   
   >   
   > >   
   > > Are you now joining the ranks of AI Rosie to determine what the word of the   
   > > Lord means?   
   >   
   > The AI that responded to me supported everything I taught from the   
   > Bible:   
      
   AI told you this, or is this your personal assumptions?   
   >   
   >   
   > 1. Gen 2:7 says Adam IS a soul.   
   > 2. OT nephesh (soul) can mean LIFE or the creature itself.   
   > 3. Gen 1:20 calls fish "souls". Thus its the whole fish.   
   >   
   > -- Darby's Bible   
   > Genesis 1:20 And God said, Let the waters swarm with swarms of living   
   > souls [nephesh], and let fowl fly above the earth in the expanse of   
   > the heavens.   
   > [My brackets]   
   >   
   > 4. NT psyche (that is how AI spelled it) is about the same as the OT.   
   > It can mean LIFE or PERSON.   
   > 5. Immortal soul came from Greek psychology, namely Plato and   
   > Aristotle. Notice:   
   >   
   > Funk and Wagnall's Encyclopedia says,   
   >   
   > "Early Judaism considered the human personality as a whole, without   
   > making a sharp distinction between body and soul....The Christian   
   > doctrine of the soul has been strongly influenced by the philosophies   
   > of Plato and Aristotle."   
   >   
   > Compton's Encyclopedia (1995) states,   
   >   
   > "The long-held notions, devised by the Greeks and others, concerning   
   > man as a composite of material body and spiritual (or immortal) soul   
   > was foreign to Israel....There was no question of the body's dying and   
   > an immortal soul's going off by itself, because the individual was   
   > believed to be a unit, not a composite of body, mind, and soul."   
      
   Nowhere did AI list this as its source. Made obvious in that you did not   
   encapsulate it with quotes with the claim that AI showed you that.   
      
   You should at least tell AI to quote only from your specified places, and to   
   mention that in its reply as its sole source. Or do not tell others that you   
   shaped what AI was to quote so that you can then post it as your own   
   commentary.   
      
   Like tell it to look up things only in the JW traditions past and present   
   that are verifiably JW, then post that as your commentary on JW life. That   
   will give you the opportunity to edit it so as to eliminate past proven lies   
   and erroneous prophecies, so as to shape it as new revealed truth in a   
   brighter light.   
      
   Now, of course, a person could always go back in time via AI to do a   
   comparative study on the JW using old doctrines that the new doctrines   
   totally contradict. Then publish the works in whole or in part on a daily   
   basis. Thus destroying a white washed fence for what it really is.   
      
   AI has already been found to have killed people due to people who followed is   
   as Artificial Intelligence rather that understanding it as just Another   
   Idiot, that makes massive mistakes and deadly conclusions.   
   >   
   >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > From a Google search page, I asked an AI what the Bible says a "soul"   
   > > > > > is. This was its answer:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > "What does the Bible say a "soul" is?   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Thinking   
   > > > > > Kicking off 11 searches   
   > > > > > Looking at 232 sites   
   > > > > > Getting info from Shopping   
   > > > > > Shopping   
   > > > > > Putting it all together   
   > > > > > The Bible describes the "soul" (Hebrew:   
   > > > > > nephesh, Greek: psyche) as the entire living being, not a separate,   
   > > > > > immortal part of a person. The concept of a soul that is inherently   
   > > > > > immortal and survives the body's death is rooted in Greek philosophy,   
   > > > > > not biblical teaching."   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Old Testament: Nephesh (??????)   
   > > > > > In the Old Testament, the Hebrew word nephesh is frequently   
   translated   
   > > > > > as "soul" but refers to the life force or a living creature itself.   
   It   
   > > > > > describes the whole person and can also mean "life," "person," or   
   > > > > > "creature".   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > A living creature: Genesis 2:7 says that when God breathed "the   
   > > > > > breath of life" into man, "man became a living soul (nephesh)". This   
   > > > > > does not mean Adam received a soul but that he became a complete,   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)