Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.bible    |    General bible-thumping discussions    |    96,161 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 94,767 of 96,161    |
|    Vincent Maycock to Robert    |
|    Re: I died and went to heaven for 18 day    |
|    30 Oct 25 02:14:06    |
      [continued from previous message]              >> > > > That is the problem with agendized dismissive arguments, they toss       out all       >> > > > forms of reality to focus on something that fits their narrative and       >> > > > thereby project false conclusions.       >> > >       >> > > Well, you're definitely not a purveyor of "reality."       >> >       >> > Same thing was said to the Wright brothers. And Issac Newton. And some in       >> > regards to the Heavenly Father. And had you given my statement some       thought       >> > you might see the truth in it.       >>       >> No, Isaac Newton was not ridiculed. "I know the lion by his claw," as       >> one mathematician/physicist remarked respectfully about one of       >> Newton's solutions to a problem. The Wright brothers were laughed at,       >> but so was Bozo the Clown (i.e., in this situation, the adage means       >> don't be so happy that you've been ridiculed).       >       >As I said, had you been looking for truth, and you weren’t. You were       >looking for possible points of arguments.              I already know enough about "truth" on this; I don't need your help to       find it in your ridiculous ideas.              >> > > > > Snip       >> > > > > So if God makes a mistake, he's unable to fix it, lest he break his       word?       >> > > >       >> > > > That is assuming that he actually makes mistakes, How can a perfect       being       >> > > > make a mistake?       >> > >       >> > > He couldn't, but then your alleged God is not a perfect being. He       >> > > would have to be fallible if he created a dominion for man that didn't       >> > > work out.       >> >       >> > Actually recreated a domain for men that he gave them dominion over it.       >> > God knew before the earth was formed what is future was to be, and while       you       >> > should read Genesis 3 to see the fall out and its effects it says,...       >>       >> One possible solution to God's quandary in the story would be to make       >> dominion over the earth to be contingent on mankind's good behavior to       >> begin with, so he could remove that dominion if trouble started       >> without going back on his word or his interest in giving humans       >> dominion over the earth.       >       >More baseless assumptions              No, not at all. I only assume what you claim or imply.              >> > Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy       >> > seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his       heel.       >> >       >> > Notice “her seed” a specific reference to Jesus of the seed of Mary. Not       >> > man and Mary but of God and Mary.       >>       >> No, it's talking about mankind's long battle with snakes, not Mary the       >> mother of Jesus. If it were, referring to Mary by name would be quite       >> a feather in the Bible's cap, but of course it never was.       >       >The bible is not an entity.              It's a collection of books believed to be inspired by many Christians.       How is that not "an entity"?              >> > (Messiah to be the seed of the woman). The servants of Christ are members       of       >> > that body of which Christ is the head, and therefore are included in this       >> > seed.       >>       >> No, the quaint fairy tale in the first part of Genesis has nothing       >> whatsoever to do with the Messiah.       >       >Knee jerk reaction. ;)              No, that comes from careful study of the tale from a critical       perspective.              >> > 1Pe 1:16 Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.       >>       >> No, be ye annoying, as he is annoying.       >>       >> > 1Pe 1:17 And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons       judgeth       >> > according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in       >> > fear:       >>       >> You still have to refer to our prayers being "in Jesus' name,"       >> apparently because you're so fearful of the Father's wrath that you       >> have to mention that Jesus is with you when you talk to the Father.       >       >I don’t have to do anything. I do not live in fear of the wrath of the       >Heavenly Father. There is a reason of promise as to why one prays in his       >name. But you know it not.              What reason is that?              >> > 1Pe 1:18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible       >> > things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by       >> > tradition from your fathers;       >> >       >> > 1Pe 1:19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without       blemish       >> > and without spot:       >>       >> A depiction of a bloodthirsty deity.       >>       >> > ***********************       >> >       >> > 1Pe 1:20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world,       but       >> > was manifest in these last times for you,       >>       >> LOL! He thought he was living in the last times!       >>       >> > ***********************       >> >       >> > 1Pe 1:21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead,       and       >> > gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.       >>       >> What is the point of those quotations?       >       >Can’t keep up with the convo? You were so busy with your intent of picking       >things apart that you never grasped the thought of the context. It answered a       >comment you made in a questioning form.              No, you posted a bunch of non sequiturs for reasons, at present, that       only you know of.              >> > There is the proof that he knew ahead of time what would happen.       Understood       >> > what might happen, and could happen and provided a way of escape from the       >> > very beginning. And like satan who desired to be God, and be bigger and       >> > badder than God, would by their life choices would be made manifest and go       >> > to dwell with Satan, their leader/ comrade in arms. Birds of a feather       and all       >> > that.       >>       >> This character Satan should have long since been killed.       >>       >> > > > > > > > It is also why Jesus said to pray that the will of the Father       be free       >> > > > > > > > to operate on earth, as He does in heaven.       >> > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > If the Father knows all, what's the point of asking about it?       >> > > > > >       >> > > > > > Jesus is not the Father.       >> > > > >       >> > > > > Yes, but what would he be doing praying to the Father? Is the Father       >> > > > > hard of hearing when it comes to who prays to him?       >> > > >       >> > > > Praying is talking, holding a conversation with, both in this world,       as       >> > > > well       >> > > > as between this world and the spiritual world that has and will always       >> > > > exist.       >> > >       >> > > No, prayer is just talking to yourself. Otherwise, in your       >> > > conversation with God, he would be able to tell you things like what's       >> > > the temperature outside -- but he can only tell you things that you       >> > > already know, indicating that in prayer is, like I said, just talking       >> > > to yourself.       >> >       >> > Well, I can sure tell you have had no relationship with Him. Also that you       >> > are clueless about how he Fathers.       >>       >> So has God ever told you what the temperature is outside?       >       >Was there ever a need for that?              Yes. It can tell you how to dress for the weather.              >> > Jhn 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you       >> > into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall       >> > hear, that’s hall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.       >>       >> What was God supposedly waiting on to provide this Spirit of truth? I       >> mean it's not as if the book of John was written the day Jesus       >> supposedly left the earth.       >       >While I know you are incapable of understanding, it was always available to       >the prophets of God. But was made possible to all who were redeemed by Jesus.              Why would it need to be "redeemed by Jesus"?              >> > Everything he told me came true exactly as specified. He has also       admonished       >> > me when needed, answered my prayer before I could even formulate a request       >> > in my mind. And later showed me a verse confirming his action that I       needed at              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca