Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.bible    |    General bible-thumping discussions    |    96,161 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 94,794 of 96,161    |
|    Vincent Maycock to Robert    |
|    Re: I died and went to heaven for 18 day    |
|    31 Oct 25 13:20:13    |
      [continued from previous message]              >> > > > > > Compassion, Men have that, it is integrated into the hearts of       men. Ever       >> > > > > > see       >> > > > > > firemen and or policeman cry? See the horror on their faces as       they       >> > > > > > hold a       >> > > > > > dying child or greatly injured child? Ever see or hear of a cop       showing       >> > > > > > empathy towards adults who were at the end of their rope? I have.       >> > > > >       >> > > > > Maybe you should tell Gabe that, given that he seems to think that       >> > > > > someone who meant what they say or avoid playing games could not be       a       >> > > > > woman. I don't know how he would react to crying cops, but remember       >> > > > > that he says Jesus is not feminine.       >> > > >       >> > > > It is a destructive sin for a man to be effeminate, why is that?       >> > >       >> > > We're talking about being feminine, (like a crying police man), not       >> > > effeminate like a transvestite.       >> >       >> > No, you are talking about something you know little of.       >> > You know as much about being a woman as the last democratic VP wannabe       knows       >> > about being a man.       >>       >> What are we supposedly missing?       >       >If you are speaking of yourself? Understanding.              Understanding of what? That's kind of a vague accusation -- maybe       it's you that's lacking in understanding here.              >> > > > > > So I don’t understand where you are coming from. Men were created       in       >> > > > > > the       >> > > > > > image of God, with all of his attributes, but in the realm of this       >> > > > > > world.       >> > > > > > We       >> > > > > > were created less than the angels. Within us is the female DNA,       as it       >> > > > > > were.       >> > > > > > Typically, females have two X chromosomes, while males have one X       and       >> > > > > > one       >> > > > > > Y       >> > > > > > chromosome. So obviously men had with in them the same attributes       as       >> > > > > > women       >> > > > > > of       >> > > > > > the 23 pairs of Chromosomes except for the pair that determined       the male       >> > > > > > of       >> > > > > > female bodily differences. And she was cloned as such so as to me       a       >> > > > > > helpmate       >> > > > > > to man.       >> > > > >       >> > > > > Again, a clone could not be a different sex from what it's being       >> > > > > cloned from. So if Eve was a clone of Adam, she would have to be a       >> > > > > male.       >> > > >       >> > > > Not at all.       >> > > >       >> > > > Gen 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and       he       >> > > > slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead       >> > > > thereof;       >> > > >       >> > > > Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a       >> > > > woman,       >> > > > and brought her unto the man.       >> > > >       >> > > > Gen 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my       >> > > > flesh:       >> > > > she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.       >> > >       >> > > The Bible never says she was a clone, anymore than saying men are made       >> > > of mud; that was you that claimed that, and that's what I was       >> > > debunking.       >> >       >> > She was rebuilt into a woman, from a bone, the process is the same as       >> > cloning.verb, not noun.       >>       >> If you insist that the Bible says Eve was a clone of Adam, you'll just       >> have to face the fact that the Bible is wrong on this.       >       >Adam had X and Y in him. Eve had XX Men carry both genes that is why their       >babies can be either male of female.       >       >In regards to cloning as done by man here are the various forms of it.       >https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Gener       >al_Biology_(Boundless)/17%3A_Biotechnology_and_Genomics/17.01%3A_Biotechnolog       >y/17.1D%3A_Reproductive_Cloning       >       >While it is not the last word or even complete word on cloning, it should       >open up you mind to help you be more aware of what cloning is and does, as       >well as why.              I know cloning exists. I'm just saying a genetically a identical       clone can't be a different sex than what's cloned from. The       Y-chromosome in a female clone of a male would be missing, which would       make the female "clone" genetically different from the male, i.e., not       strictly speaking a *genetically identical* clone.              >Again reading comprehension requires contextual understandings and not bit       >parsing to fit ones agenda.              You keep going back to this "agenda" thing. I don't have any more of       an agenda as an atheist, than you do as a Christian in this       discussion.              >> > > > > > > > > So what's wrong with being soft or nice? And are women       prone to       >> > > > > > > > > "playing games", more so then men? Do women not mean what       they say?       >> > > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > > He also is Love. PURE Love, and he knows what the intent of       our heart       >> > > > > > > > is.       >> > > > > > > > Thank you for your honestly in your reply, and what you       described was       >> > > > > > > > your       >> > > > > > > > own thoughts.       >> > > > > > > > I would never have thought that, and there is no reason for       anyone to.       >> > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > What are you talking about?       >> > > > > >       >> > > > > > Reflecting on your comment. As I cannot see your point made, nor       your       >> > > > > > reasoning there.       >> > > > >       >> > > > > Maybe you should reflect a little more before you post.       >> > > > >       >> > > > > > > > I was rough and tough, in this life, yet with women, and       children I       >> > > > > > > > was       >> > > > > > > > gentle and kind, Karen’s were given another chance ;) but if       they       >> > > > > > > > persisted       >> > > > > > > > I would let them be. I would be understanding with men as       well when       >> > > > > > > > they       >> > > > > > > > were       >> > > > > > > > genuinely going through a rough time. But not with whiners,       wimps, or       >> > > > > > > > bullies of others. So I guess my outlook was a lot different       than       >> > > > > > > > yours.       >> > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > Do you think women are wimps?       >> > > > > >       >> > > > > > Some are, but what is your point?       >> > > > >       >> > > > > I'm trying to determine whether you share Gabe's evident belief that       >> > > > > women are somehow less than men. Some women are wimps, but as a rule       >> > > > > do they tend to be wimps, in your view?       >> > > >       >> > > > Why do you always operate in the accusative. There is no reason for       you to       >> > > > think that of Gabe or myself.       >> > >       >> > > I wasn't "thinking that", I was questioning you if you had that       >> > > opinion of women. I take it from your reply on this that the answer is       >> > > no, you don't think women are wimpy in general. Gabe Poirot may       >> > > disagree with you, though.       >> >       >> > You question via insinuation and presumptive thinking/statements.       >>       >> And that somehow prevents you from answering the question?       >       >Your attempt to shape the narration to favor your point, as if it were the       >fact of the matter, is a total distortion of freedom of expression and       >understandings.              No, I don't have a problem with freedom of expression. After all, I'm       not forcing you to accept my narrative of the discussion, and you're       free to shape the narration as much as I try to.              >> > > > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > > > > > > > *he refers to the Flood as being a historical       event, when modern       >> > > > > > > > > > > > > geology has concluded that it never occurred       >> > > > > > > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > > > > > > https://biblicalscienceinstitute.com/ge       logy/overview-of-geologic-       >> > > > > > > > > > > > ev       >> > > > > > > > > > > > id       >> > > > > > > > > > > > en       >> > > > > > > > > > > > ce       >> > > > > > > > > > > > -of-the-flood/       >> > > > > > > > > > > >       >> > > > > > > > > > > > Geologists know how limestone is formed. That fact       alone bears              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca