XPost: alt.christnet.bible, alt.christnet.christnews, alt.christ   
   et.christianlife   
   XPost: christnet.bible, christnet.bible.study   
   From: usenet@christrose.news   
      
   The medium did not control what happened   
      
   Many expositors (Keil & Delitzsch, Walter Kaiser, Dale Ralph Davis) note   
   that the woman was shocked when Samuel actually appeared. This implies   
   that she usually relied on deception or demonic manipulation, but in   
   this moment God overruled every dark power. The sudden fear (28:12)   
   shows she did not expect the real Samuel. God interrupted her practice   
   to deliver His own message of judgment.   
      
   God’s silence was an act of judicial hardening   
      
   A number of commentators point out that God’s refusal to answer Saul   
   (28:6) was not a momentary withholding of guidance but the culmination   
   of years of hardened rebellion. God withheld dreams, Urim, and prophets   
   because Saul had long rejected every legitimate means of hearing God.   
   His silence revealed judgment already underway, not a delay in   
   communication.   
      
   Samuel’s message was not new revelation   
      
   Scholars emphasize that Samuel did not reveal new information but   
   repeated what Saul had already heard (28:17–19). This sets a theological   
   pattern: when God’s Word has been repeatedly ignored, no new word comes.   
   Instead, the old word returns in judgment. The passage illustrates that   
   seeking new guidance while ignoring old revelation is spiritual folly.   
      
   Saul’s disguise symbolized his spiritual condition   
      
   Many writers (Kaiser, Davis, Bergen) highlight the irony of Saul   
   disguising himself to visit a medium on a night when he should have been   
   leading as God’s chosen king. His disguise pictures his inner   
   state—spiritually dark, internally divided, hiding from God, and trying   
   to appear as someone he was not. His outward concealment exposed his   
   inward collapse.   
      
   The narrative intentionally contrasts Saul and David   
      
   Expositors note that the chapter places Saul at a witch’s house while   
   David seeks the Lord’s direction from the priest with the ephod   
   (chapters 29–30). The structure shows two kings responding to crises:   
   one in despair turning to forbidden counsel, the other turning to the   
   Lord. The writer uses contrast to show why David rises and Saul falls.   
      
      
   I found this insight to be the gem:   
      
   Samuel’s message was not new revelation   
      
   Scholars emphasize that Samuel did not reveal new information but   
   repeated what Saul had already heard (28:17–19). This sets a theological   
   pattern: when God’s Word has been repeatedly ignored, no new word comes.   
   Instead, the old word returns in judgment. The passage illustrates that   
   seeking new guidance while ignoring old revelation is spiritual folly.   
      
   --   
   Have you heard the good news Christ died for our sins (†), and God   
   raised Him from the dead?   
      
   That Christ died for our sins shows we're sinners who deserve the death   
   penalty. That God raised Him from the dead shows Christ's death   
   satisfied God's righteous demands against our sin (Romans 3:25; 1 John   
   2:1-2). This means God can now remain just, while forgiving you of your   
   sins, and saving you from eternal damnation.   
      
   On the basis of Christ's death and resurrection for our sins, call on   
   the name of the Lord to save you: "For 'everyone who calls on the name   
   of the Lord will be saved'" (Romans 10:13, ESV).   
      
   https://christrose.news/salvation   
      
   To automatically receive daily Bible teaching updates with colorful   
   images and website formatting, subscribe to my feed in a client like   
   Thunderbird:   
      
   https://www.christrose.news/feeds/posts/default   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)