Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.bible    |    General bible-thumping discussions    |    96,161 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,440 of 96,161    |
|    Christ Rose to All    |
|    Re: Christ is the only escape from etern    |
|    12 Dec 25 15:33:01    |
   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: usenet@christrose.news   
      
   James,   
      
   You repeatedly say, “It’s not my doctrine, it’s the Bible’s.”   
   Scripture   
   itself tests that claim. The issue is not ownership but meaning. Words   
   mean what God intends in context, not what rescues a system.   
      
   Romans 6:7 does not teach that physical death cleanses sin for   
   unbelievers. Paul explains who “has died” in the immediate context: “We   
   were buried therefore with him by baptism into death” (Romans 6:4, ESV).   
   “Our old self was crucified with him” (Romans 6:6, ESV). The death that   
   frees from sin occurs in union with Christ, not in the grave apart from   
   Him. Paul excludes unbelievers when he says, “If we have died with   
   Christ, we believe that we will also live with him” (Romans 6:8, ESV).   
   You detach verse 7 from Christ and give it to those who reject Him. Paul   
   never does that.   
      
   Hebrews 9:27 fixes the order you keep dissolving. “It is appointed for   
   man to die once, and after that comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27, ESV). Not   
   probation. Not silence. Judgment. Scripture never inserts a gap for   
   moral reset. Jesus echoes this finality: “Between us and you a great   
   chasm has been fixed” (Luke 16:26, ESV). Fixed means fixed.   
      
   John 5:29 divides humanity into two resurrections, not one neutral   
   resurrection followed by later sorting. “Those who have done good to the   
   resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection   
   of judgment” (John 5:29, ESV). The moral character carried into   
   resurrection determines the outcome. Jesus never hints that the evil   
   rise cleansed or undecided.   
      
   You argue that degrees of judgment can fit non-existence. Jesus denies   
   that. “It will be more tolerable on the day of judgment for the land of   
   Sodom than for you” (Matthew 11:24, ESV). “More tolerable” describes   
   experience, not headcount, relatives, or symbolism. Non-existence has no   
   tolerability scale.   
      
   You dismiss Jesus’ statement about Judas. Scripture does not. “It would   
   have been better for that man if he had not been born” (Matthew 26:24,   
   ESV). Not being born and ceasing to exist describe the same state. Jesus   
   says Judas faces something worse. Words cannot say less.   
      
   You mock the warning about the undying worm and unquenched fire. Jesus   
   cites Isaiah deliberately. “Their worm does not die, and the fire is not   
   quenched” (Mark 9:48, ESV). I supply the proper term: [Gehenna]. An   
   unquenched fire and an undying worm do not teach extinction. They teach   
   persistence. Symbols reinforce reality; they do not reverse it.   
      
   You object that God would be cruel. Scripture answers that charge   
   directly. “The Lord is righteous in all his ways” (Psalm 145:17, ESV).   
   “Will not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?” (Genesis 18:25,   
   ESV). The standard for justice comes from God, not human sentiment.   
      
   You say the soul dies. Jesus says otherwise. “Do not fear those who kill   
   the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both   
   soul and body in [Gehenna]” (Matthew 10:28, ESV). Destroy here does not   
   mean erase. The same verb describes ruined wineskins that still exist   
   (Luke 5:37). The soul survives bodily death and faces God.   
      
   You reject Luke 16 as teaching doctrine. Jesus names Lazarus and   
   Abraham. He describes consciousness, memory, regret, pain, and awareness   
   after death (Luke 16:23–25, ESV). Whether narrative or not, it teaches   
   exactly what it portrays. Conscious existence continues.   
      
   You argue about stauros. Scripture centers on the act, not the shape.   
   “We preach Christ crucified” (1 Corinthians 1:23, ESV). “He himself bore   
   our sins in his body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:24, ESV). The instrument   
   does not empty the atonement. The blood does.   
      
   Meanwhile, we know from history that Romans attached a patibulum (cross   
   beam) to the staurus (pole), forming a T or t shaped "cross":   
      
   1. Plautus (c. 254–184 BC) – *Miles Gloriosus* 359–360   
      
    "Patibulum ferat per urbem, deinde affigatur cruci" (Plautus,   
    *Miles Gloriosus* 359–360).   
      
    ("Let him carry the patibulum through the city, then be fastened   
    to the cross").   
      
   This shows that the condemned carried the patibulum to the site of   
   execution, consistent with Gospel accounts (John 19:17).   
      
   2. Seneca the Younger (c. 4 BC–AD 65) – *De Vita Beata* 19.3   
      
    "Aliter patiuntur bestiarum ictus aut patibulo suffiguntur"   
    (Seneca, *De Vita Beata* 19.3)   
      
    ("They suffer blows from beasts or are fastened to the   
    patibulum.")   
      
   Seneca mentions criminals being fastened to the patibulum, indicating it   
   was a physical beam.   
      
   3. Justinian’s Digest (compiled AD 533)   
      
    "Qui patibulo adfixus est" *Digest* 48.19.28 §15.   
      
    ("He who has been affixed to the patibulum.")   
      
   This shows legal terminology acknowledging the patibulum as part of   
   crucifixion.   
      
   These sources confirm that Roman crucifixion involved the patibulum,   
   which the condemned carried and was affixed to, forming the traditional   
   cross structure (T or †). The concept of outstretched arms (e.g., John   
   21:18) assumes this form.   
      
   Revelation closes the canon with language you cannot dissolve. “The   
   smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever, and they have no rest,   
   day or night” (Revelation 14:11, ESV). No rest requires consciousness.   
   Forever and ever denies annihilation.   
      
   You insist you never denied the need for Christ. Yet your claims say men   
   can die without Him, rise free of guilt, and only later face loss of   
   life. Scripture says the opposite. “Whoever does not obey the Son shall   
   not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him” (John 3:36, ESV).   
   Remains means already present.   
      
   The gospel calls men now. “Now is the day of salvation” (2 Corinthians   
   6:2, ESV). Christ died for sins and rose (1 Corinthians 15:3–4, ESV).   
   His blood cleanses now (1 John 1:7, ESV). Outside of Him, judgment stands.   
      
   Scripture does not contradict itself. It contradicts your conclusions.   
      
   --   
   Have you heard the good news Christ died for our sins (†), and God   
   raised Him from the dead?   
      
   That Christ died for our sins shows we're sinners who deserve the death   
   penalty. That God raised Him from the dead shows Christ's death   
   satisfied God's righteous demands against our sin (Romans 3:25; 1 John   
   2:1-2). This means God can now remain just, while forgiving you of your   
   sins, and saving you from eternal damnation.   
      
   On the basis of Christ's death and resurrection for our sins, call on   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca