XPost: alt.checkmate, rec.food.cooking, can.politics   
   From: zed@is.dead   
      
   On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:11:37 -0600   
   Hank Rogers  wrote:   
      
   > Mars Sellus wrote on 2/21/2026 5:42 PM:   
   > > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:36:45 -0600   
   > > phoenix  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   > >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600   
   > >>> phoenix  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   > >>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600   
   > >>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus    
   > >>>>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600   
   > >>>>>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600   
   > >>>>>>>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Doc Hammerslack"  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2? Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 * 1 != 1 ^2.  Your original equation was   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructed using 0, which is a notorious sucker of   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematical sense.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that ever there was.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> intertwingled.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I think our world is natural.[*]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***],   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to be part of it.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the fourth gospel was written.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time to time.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> tools.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> +1   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can   
   > >>>>>>>>> appear human to the public but are essentially alien   
   > >>>>>>>>> lizards that maintain their power through "blood-drinking"   
   > >>>>>>>>> and other dark rituals.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> +1   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> You are on point.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Christ is King!   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> God doesn't like it when you do that.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> And that must be sufficient.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Idolatry?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood   
   > >>>>>> because I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein   
   > >>>>>> Camp.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> You hear voices, as in multiple?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Please elaborate.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the   
   > >>>> time. I can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental   
   > >>>> like all voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over   
   > >>>> everything, and heating up my red eyes.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?   
   > >>   
   > >> I meant that I got angry. I don't really know the metaphors for   
   > >> anger very well, being a man of self-control.   
   > >   
   > > Understood, it fits that.   
   > >   
   > > Those voices were not your friends.   
   > >   
   > > But some (I believe) can be.   
   > >   
   > > Test using Christ and all will be revealed.   
   > >   
   >   
   > It's a hell of a lot faster and easier to simply go to truth social   
   > and ask.  The answer is always perfectly acceptable to christ.   
      
   Christ isn't grading social media yet, when He does, watch out!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)